Journal Article10.1016/J.DENTAL.2006.02.002
How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods.
376
TL;DR: All wear methods lack the evidence of their clinical relevance because prospective studies correlating in vitro with long-term in vivo results with identical materials are not available.
read more
About: This article is published in Dental Materials. The article was published on 01 Aug 2006. The article focuses on the topics: Dental Restoration Wear.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel
Sridhar Janyavula,Nathaniel C. Lawson,Deniz Cakir,Preston Beck,Lance C. Ramp,John O. Burgess +5 more
TL;DR: Within the limitations of the study, polished zirconia is wear-friendly to the opposing tooth, and veneering porcelain demonstrated the most.
313
In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns
TL;DR: Milling zirconia to full-contour with glazed surface might be an alternative to traditionally veneered restorations in terms of light-transmission, contact wear (restoration and antagonist) and load-bearing capacity.
301
Academy of Dental Materials guidance-Resin composites: Part I-Mechanical properties.
Nicoleta Ilie,Thomas J. Hilton,Siegward D. Heintze,Reinhard Hickel,David C. Watts,Nikolaos Silikas,Jeffrey W. Stansbury,Milena Cadenaro,Jack L. Ferracane +8 more
TL;DR: This project review and critically appraise methods to determine fracture, deformation and wear resistance of dental resin composites in an attempt to provide guidance for investigators endeavoring to study these properties for these materials.
293
Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro.
TL;DR: The set-up that consists of unprepared enamel of molar cusps against glazed crowns seems to be the most appropriate method to evaluate a ceramic material with regard to antagonist wear, however, due to the high variability of results large sample sizes are necessary to differentiate between materials, which calls the whole in vitro approach into question.
290
Tribology of dental materials: a review
Zhongrong Zhou,Jun Zheng +1 more
TL;DR: The anatomy and function of human teeth is presented in brief, three types of current artificial dental materials are summarized, and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as typical clinical applications, are compared based on the literature.
187
References
In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
TL;DR: It was concluded that some indirect composite restoratives have similar wear resistance to the type III gold alloy tested, and antagonistic enamel wear of gold alloy was similar with the value of Sculpture.
•Journal Article
Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition.
TL;DR: Dental literature, predominantly since 1990, was reviewed for longitudinal, controlled clinical studies and retrospective cross-sectional studies of posterior restorations and principal reasons for failure were secondary caries, fracture, marginal deficiencies, wear and postoperative sensitivity.
•Journal Article
Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
Reinhard Hickel,J Manhart +1 more
TL;DR: The principal reasons for failure were secondary caries, fracture, marginal deficiencies, wear, and postoperative sensitivity in posterior stress-bearing posterior cavities.
Thermocycling--the effects upon the compressive strength and abrasion resistance of three composite resins.
TL;DR: Interestingly, thermocycling P-50 with an upper temperature limit of 50 degrees C had catastrophic consequences upon the measured properties, and it is concluded that some of the observed behaviour may have potentially detrimental implications upon the long-term clinical durability of the materials tested.
Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements
TL;DR: The wear of ceramic inlay materials and antagonist enamel cups was measured in vitro and the wear in the occlusal contact area was quantified during and at the end of the test with a three-dimensional scanner.