Journal Article10.1109/TEM.2018.2791501
How Do Accelerators Select Startups? Shifting Decision Criteria Across Stages
Bangqi Yin,Jianxi Luo +1 more
76
TL;DR: Analysis of a unique dataset of the real profiles of the startups that applied to the first seed accelerator in Southeast Asia and the accelerator's decisions to uncover the selection process and latent criteria revealed that accelerator managers’ implicit decision criteria shifted from eight real or win criteria in the initial screening of many startups to another four win or worth criterion in the final selection of a small number of startups.
read more
Abstract: Competitive accelerators can help startups overcome resource constraints and the liability of newness, but they are also highly selective when choosing startups. However, little is known about how a top accelerator selects startups and what the decision criteria are in that process. Here, we analyze a unique dataset of the real profiles of the startups that applied to the first seed accelerator in Southeast Asia and the accelerator's decisions to uncover the selection process and latent criteria. We used a scoreboard of 30 criteria based on the real-win-worth (Is it real? Can it win? Is it worth doing?) framework to compare the profiles of the selected versus the rejected startups. Our analyses revealed that accelerator managers’ implicit decision criteria shifted from eight real or win criteria in the initial screening of many startups to another four win or worth criteria in the final selection of a small number of startups. These critical criteria were further used to build regression models that predict screening and selection results. Understanding the shifting decision criteria may inform accelerator managers of their own subconscious preferences to improve the decision process, and as a result also increase entrepreneurs’ empathy toward accelerator managers to sharpen their applications.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A systematic literature review on accelerators
Emil Lucian Crișan,Irina Iulia Salanță,Ioana Beleiu,Ovidiu Bordean,Ovidiu Bordean,Raluca Bunduchi +5 more
TL;DR: This article reviewed the existing scholarly research on accelerators using the Context-Intervention-Mechanism-Outcome framework and identified four mechanisms which explain how accelerators operate and the role they play in supporting entrepreneurship and innovation.
The Evolution of the Incubator: Past, Present, and Future
TL;DR: This paper presents lessons learned from prior research and provides a range of indicative areas for further empirical studies at four levels of analysis, to help direct researchers in their endeavors to contribute to the next generation of incubations.
46
Knowledge spillover in entrepreneurial emergence: A learning perspective
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply a learning lens to knowledge spillover to investigate how knowledge is created and shared and how it relates to entrepreneurial emergence, and reveal that knowledge spillovers originate from an initial stock of knowledge that is continuously updated and extended via experiential learning.
38
Too Much of Two Good Things: Effects of Founders’ Educational Level and Heterogeneity on Start-Up Funds Raised
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the impact of co-founders' education on early-stage start-ups' fund raising performance and found that educational level and educational heterogeneity positively affect the amount of funds raised, but their joint presence negatively moderates the relationship.
25
References
Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making.
TL;DR: The authors examined the role of effort and accuracy in the adaptive use of decision processes and found that people were highly adaptive to changes in the nature of the alternatives available to them and to the presence of time pressure.
2K
Reason-based choice
TL;DR: The role of reasons in decision making is considered as it relates to uncertainty, conflict, context effects, and normative decision rules.
1.6K
New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers?
TL;DR: Cooper and Kleinschmidt as mentioned in this paper concluded that product superiority is the number one factor influencing commercial success and that project definition and early, predevelopment activities are the most critical steps in the new products development process.
1.3K