Open AccessJournal Article
Health interview surveys. Towards international harmonization of methods and instruments.
526
TL;DR: This book provides practical guidance on methods for health interview surveys, and is essential reading for all concerned in the planning and carrying out of such surveys, whether in national statistical offices or in public or private interviewing agencies.
read more
Abstract: With the strategy for health for all and its 38 targets, the WHO Regional Office for Europe has created a common health policy for Europe, and has developed internationally agreed indicators for measuring progress towards the attainment of the targets. Some of these indicators are "classical" health indicators, such as mortality rates and the incidence of notifiable diseases, while others reflect more recent public health concerns such as health-related behaviour and quality of life. For the latter group, gathering the information necessary for monitoring and evaluating progress is somewhat haphazard. Health interview surveys provide the best -- in some cases the only -- means of collecting data on many of these indicators, since they mirror the information that only properly approached individuals may be able to provide and ensure that all subgroups of the population are covered. Yet such surveys have enjoyed a long tradition only in a few countries. Moreover, when these indicators are covered, the results are often not comparable. The methods and instruments used to collect data have often been developed without international coordination or adapted from those used in other countries, usually with substantial modification to suit what are perceived to be local requirements. There has also tended to be considerable uncertainty among those countries lacking a tradition of health interviewing as to the best way of conducting surveys. Against this background, the WHO Regional Office and Statistics Netherlands organized a series of consultations, which have resulted in the internationally agreed methods and instruments for health interview surveys set out in this book. These methods and instruments are likely in the longer term to become standards, thus improving comparability of information. This book provides practical guidance on methods for health interview surveys. It is thus essential reading for all concerned in the planning and carrying out of such surveys, whether in national statistical offices or in public or private interviewing agencies. It will also be useful to all in the public health community, including students and academics.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Validity of questions in the use of specific drug-groups in health surveys.
Kari Furu,Dag S. Thelle +1 more
TL;DR: Investigating whether morbidity in the general population could be assessed by questions on drug use in the Norwegian Health Survey 1995 showed that only using a dichotomous outcome variable, is too low to give a sufficiently valid measure of the morbidities in the population.
15
Association of multi-morbidity, social participation, functional and mental health with the self-rated health of middle-aged and older adults in India: a study based on LASI wave-1
Gursimran Singh Rana,Anandi Shukla,Akif Mustafa,Mahadev Bramhankar,Balram Rai,Mohit Pandey,Nand Lal Mishra +6 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examined the association of self-rated health (SRH) and various socio-economic and health-related factors such as multi-morbidity status, mental health, functional health, and social participation.
14
The employment of older workers
Natalia A. Zhivan
- 01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: This chapter discusses trends in employment among older workers in the EU and the health conditions of older workers.
Variance estimation methods for health expectancy by relative socio-economic status
TL;DR: The study suggests that using the raw survey data and the Delta method while accounting for the survey design, gives better estimates for the variance compared to the bootstrap method and therefore is a highly recommended method for variance estimation of HE by relative socio-economic status.
The Association Between Happiness and Self-Rated Physical Health of African American Men: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study:
TL;DR: Findings suggest that AAM who are happy report better physical health than those who report not being happy, and public health promotion strategies focusing on AAM should consider happiness as a promising influence that may positively impact physical health.
13