Open AccessJournal Article
Health interview surveys. Towards international harmonization of methods and instruments.
526
TL;DR: This book provides practical guidance on methods for health interview surveys, and is essential reading for all concerned in the planning and carrying out of such surveys, whether in national statistical offices or in public or private interviewing agencies.
read more
Abstract: With the strategy for health for all and its 38 targets, the WHO Regional Office for Europe has created a common health policy for Europe, and has developed internationally agreed indicators for measuring progress towards the attainment of the targets. Some of these indicators are "classical" health indicators, such as mortality rates and the incidence of notifiable diseases, while others reflect more recent public health concerns such as health-related behaviour and quality of life. For the latter group, gathering the information necessary for monitoring and evaluating progress is somewhat haphazard. Health interview surveys provide the best -- in some cases the only -- means of collecting data on many of these indicators, since they mirror the information that only properly approached individuals may be able to provide and ensure that all subgroups of the population are covered. Yet such surveys have enjoyed a long tradition only in a few countries. Moreover, when these indicators are covered, the results are often not comparable. The methods and instruments used to collect data have often been developed without international coordination or adapted from those used in other countries, usually with substantial modification to suit what are perceived to be local requirements. There has also tended to be considerable uncertainty among those countries lacking a tradition of health interviewing as to the best way of conducting surveys. Against this background, the WHO Regional Office and Statistics Netherlands organized a series of consultations, which have resulted in the internationally agreed methods and instruments for health interview surveys set out in this book. These methods and instruments are likely in the longer term to become standards, thus improving comparability of information. This book provides practical guidance on methods for health interview surveys. It is thus essential reading for all concerned in the planning and carrying out of such surveys, whether in national statistical offices or in public or private interviewing agencies. It will also be useful to all in the public health community, including students and academics.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Shortened and Culturally Appropriate HIV Stigma Scale for Asians Living with HIV in the United States: Psychometric Analysis
TL;DR: The Stigma Scale for ALWH is described that is culturally appropriate to measure HIV stigma experienced by ALWH in the United States and contains 13 items with three subscales with good reliability and validity.
30
Self-rated health, socioeconomic status and all-cause mortality in Chinese middle-aged and elderly adults
Yayun Fan,Di He +1 more
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors investigated the association between SRH status and all-cause mortality, and investigated whether the SRH-mortality association varies across different socioeconomic status (SES) groups among middle-aged and older Chinese adults.
Migration and self-rated health: a comparison between Finns living in Sweden and Finns living in Finland.
TL;DR: Migration may have a different effect on Finnish men's and women's self-rated health, and Finns in Finland and in Sweden rated their health poorer than Swedes.
30
Health status, intention to seek health examination, and participation in health education among taxi drivers in jinan, china.
TL;DR: Taxi drivers’ health was poor in this survey and effective programs that improve the health of individuals in this special occupational group are needed.
30
Comparison of self-rated health in older people of St. Petersburg, Russia, and Tampere, Finland: how sensitive is SRH to cross-cultural factors?
TL;DR: The conclusion is that self-rated health is sensitive to cultural and social factors, and was better in Tampere than in St. Petersburg when symptoms, chronic diseases and functional ability were adjusted for.
28