Journal Article10.1007/S12155-014-9555-0
Harvest Date Effects on Biomass Yield, Moisture Content, Mineral Concentration, and Mineral Export in Switchgrass and Native Polycultures Managed for Bioenergy
Joshua D. Gamble,Jacob M. Jungers,Donald L. Wyse,Gregg A. Johnson,John A. Lamb,Craig C. Sheaffer +5 more
23
TL;DR: In this article, the effect of harvest timing on yield, moisture, and mineral concentration of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and native polyculture biomass was investigated.
read more
Abstract: Various local factors influence the decision of when to harvest grassland biomass for renewable energy including climate, plant composition, and phenological stage. However, research on biomass yield and quality related to a wide range of harvest timing from multiple environments and years is lacking. Our objective was to determine the effect of harvest timing on yield, moisture, and mineral concentration of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and native polyculture biomass. Biomass was harvested on 56 unique days ranging from late summer (2 September) to late spring (20 May) spanning 3 years (2009 to 2011) and seven sites in Minnesota, USA. Biomass yield varied considerably by location and year (range = 0.7–11.7 Mg ha−1) and was lowest during the winter. On average, there was no difference in biomass yield harvested in early fall compared to late spring. Biomass moisture content was lowest in late spring, averaging 156 g kg−1 across all locations and years when harvested after 1 April. Biomass N concentration did not change across harvest dates; however, P and K concentrations declined dramatically from late summer to late spring. Considering the economic costs of replacing exported minerals and changes in revenues from biomass yield through time, biomass harvest should be conducted in late summer–early fall or late spring and avoided in winter. However, biomass managed for gasification should be harvested in spring to reduce concentrations of minerals that lead to slagging and fouling. Changes in biomass yield and quality through time were similar for switchgrass and native polyculture biomass. These biomass harvest recommendations are made from data spanning multiple years and locations and should be applicable to various growing conditions across the Upper Midwest.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Switchgrass Harvest Progression in the North-Central USA
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a harvest progression model that uses drying rate, mower and baler productivity, and weather conditions as major inputs for switchgrass harvest progression in the North-Central USA.
5
Solid Fuel Generation from Urban Leaf Litter in Mixture with Grass Cuttings: Chemical Composition, Energetic Characteristics, and Impact of Preprocessing
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the effect of the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) on material and energy fluxes as well as relevant characteristics of resulting energy carriers.
4
Phenotyping Winter Dormancy in Switchgrass to Extend the Growing Season and Improve Biomass Yield
TL;DR: A reliable phenotyping method for winter dormancy in switchgrass using various traits including regrowth height after clipping in early fall (FRH), senescence percentage, date of spring regrowth (SRD), and flowering date (FD) is described.
References
•Journal Article
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
TL;DR: Copyright (©) 1999–2012 R Foundation for Statistical Computing; permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and permission notice are preserved on all copies.
410.8K
Model selection in ecology and evolution
TL;DR: The steps of model selection are outlined and several ways that it is now being implemented are highlighted, so that researchers in ecology and evolution will find a valuable alternative to traditional null hypothesis testing, especially when more than one hypothesis is plausible.
3.8K
Combustion properties of biomass
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the properties of biomass relevant to combustion is briefly reviewed and the compositions of biomass among fuel types are variable, especially with respect to inorganic constituents important to the critical problems of fouling and slagging.
1.9K
Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels
TL;DR: In this paper, the structural, proximate and ultimate analyses of biomass and wastes differ considerably, some properties of the biomass samples such as the hydrogen content, the sulfur content and the ignition temperatures changed in a narrow interval.
1.5K