Journal Article10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2010.04.026
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Elie A. Akl,Regina Kunz,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Jan Brozek,Susan L Norris,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Paul Glasziou,Hans deBeer,Roman Jaeschke,David Rind,Joerg J Meerpohl,Philipp Dahm,Holger J. Schünemann +14 more
TL;DR: The GRADE process begins with asking an explicit question, including specification of all important outcomes, and provides explicit criteria for rating the quality of evidence that include study design, risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and magnitude of effect.
read more
About: This article is published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. The article was published on 01 Apr 2011. The article focuses on the topics: Evidence-based medicine & Evidence-based practice.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis
Claire Glenton,Christopher J. Colvin,Benedicte Carlsen,Alison Swartz,Simon Lewin,Jane Noyes,Arash Rashidian +6 more
TL;DR: Lay health workers in high income countries mainly offered promotion, counselling and support, while in low and middle income countries, LHWs offered similar services but sometimes also distributed supplements, contraceptives and other products, and diagnosed and treated children with common childhood diseases.
Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors
TL;DR: Pro use appears to be acceptable to patients, enables earlier detection of symptoms and may improve communication between clinicians and patients, however, the impact of routine PROMs collection on health outcomes is less clear and high-quality research is still warranted.
481
World Health Organization treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis, 2016 update.
Dennis Falzon,Holger J. Schünemann,Elizabeth P. Harausz,Licé González-Angulo,Christian Lienhardt,Ernesto Jaramillo,Karin Weyer +6 more
TL;DR: The new WHO guidelines recommend a standardised 9–12 months shorter treatment regimen as first choice in patients with multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) strains not resistant to fluoroquinolones or second-line injectable agents; resistance to these two classes of core second- line medicines is rapidly detectable with molecular diagnostics also approved by WHO in 2016.
481
Behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline.
Jack D. Edinger,J. Todd Arnedt,Suzanne M. Bertisch,Colleen E. Carney,John J. Harrington,Kenneth L. Lichstein,Michael J. Sateia,Wendy M. Troxel,Eric S. Zhou,Uzma Kazmi,Jonathan L. Heald,Jennifer L. Martin +11 more
TL;DR: This guideline establishes clinical practice recommendations for the use of behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults based on a systematic review of the literature and an assessment of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
473
Homocysteine‐lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events
TL;DR: Whether homocysteine-lowering interventions, provided to patients with and without pre-existing cardiovascular disease are effective in preventing cardiovascular events, as well as reducing all-cause mortality, and to evaluate their safety is evaluated.
References
•Journal Article
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Abstract: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Regina Kunz,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Pablo Alonso-Coello,Holger J. Schünemann +6 more
TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.
What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Regina Kunz,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Holger J. Schünemann +5 more
TL;DR: Guideline developers use a bewildering variety of systems to rate the quality of the evidence underlying their recommendations as mentioned in this paper, some are facile, some confused, and others sophisticated but complex.
•Book
Clinical practice guidelines : directions for a new program
Marilyn J. Field,Kathleen N. Lohr +1 more
- 01 Jan 1990
TL;DR: This clinical practice guidelines directions for a new program, it will really give you the good idea to be successful.
1.8K
Going from evidence to recommendations
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Regina Kunz,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Alessandro Liberati,Holger J. Schünemann +6 more
TL;DR: The GRADE system classifies recommendations made in guidelines as either strong or weak, and the meaning of these descriptions and their implications for patients, clinicians, and policy makers are explored.