Journal Article10.1021/JM030644S
Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.
Thomas A. Halgren,Robert B. Murphy,Richard A. Friesner,Hege S. Beard,Leah L. Frye,W. Thomas Pollard,Jay L. Banks +6 more
TL;DR: Comparisons to results for the thymidine kinase and estrogen receptors published by Rognan and co-workers show that Glide 2.5 performs better than GOLD 1.1, FlexX 1.8, or DOCK 4.01.
read more
Abstract: Glide's ability to identify active compounds in a database screen is characterized by applying Glide to a diverse set of nine protein receptors. In many cases, two, or even three, protein sites are employed to probe the sensitivity of the results to the site geometry. To make the database screens as realistic as possible, the screens use sets of “druglike” decoy ligands that have been selected to be representative of what we believe is likely to be found in the compound collection of a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company. Results are presented for releases 1.8, 2.0, and 2.5 of Glide. The comparisons show that average measures for both “early” and “global” enrichment for Glide 2.5 are 3 times higher than for Glide 1.8 and more than 2 times higher than for Glide 2.0 because of better results for the least well-handled screens. This improvement in enrichment stems largely from the better balance of the more widely parametrized GlideScore 2.5 function and the inclusion of terms that penalize ligand−protei...
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
RNA–ligand molecular docking: Advances and challenges
TL;DR: An overview of the recently developed computational methods for RNA–ligand docking and their advantages and disadvantages is presented.
51
Docking of Covalent Ligands: Challenges and Approaches.
TL;DR: The question arises how to approach covalent ligands and which methods to choose for their docking and design, and the need for a broader exploration of binding modes in docking calculations.
51
Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drug Design
Shikha Agnihotry,Rajesh Kumar Pathak,Ajeet K. Srivastav,Pradeep Shukla,Budhayash Gautam +4 more
- 01 Jan 2020
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present some basic algorithms, molecular docking programs based on rigid and flexible receptor/ligand, based on various machine learning techniques used in CADD and molecular docking.
51
Discovery and evaluation of novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis ketol-acid reductoisomerase inhibitors as therapeutic drug leads
TL;DR: This work used molecular docking to identify seventeen potential inhibitors of KARI using an in-house database and selected two compounds, compounds 14 and 16, which exhibited low toxicity against RAW 2647 cell lines and are promising candidates for development as an anti-TB drug leads.
51
Pharmacophore filtering and 3D-QSAR in the discovery of new JAK2 inhibitors
TL;DR: Interestingly, some of the compounds show activity against JAK2 by PASS biological activity prediction, and these molecules could be potential selective inhibitors of Jak2 that can be experimentally validated and their backbone structural scaffold could serve as building blocks in designing drug-like molecules for JAK1.
51
References
Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.
Richard A. Friesner,Jay L. Banks,Robert B. Murphy,Thomas A. Halgren,Jasna Klicic,Daniel T. Mainz,Matthew P. Repasky,Eric H. Knoll,Mee Shelley,Jason K. Perry,David E. Shaw,Perry Francis,Peter S Shenkin +12 more
TL;DR: Glide approximates a complete systematic search of the conformational, orientational, and positional space of the docked ligand to find the best docked pose using a model energy function that combines empirical and force-field-based terms.
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.
TL;DR: GOLD (Genetic Optimisation for Ligand Docking) is an automated ligand docking program that uses a genetic algorithm to explore the full range of ligand conformational flexibility with partial flexibility of the protein, and satisfies the fundamental requirement that the ligand must displace loosely bound water on binding.
6.5K
A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm
TL;DR: This work presents an automatic method for docking organic ligands into protein binding sites that combines an appropriate model of the physico-chemical properties of the docked molecules with efficient methods for sampling the conformational space of the ligand.
2.8K
Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes
TL;DR: A simple empirical scoring function designed to estimate the free energy of binding for aprotein–ligand complex when the 3D structure of the complex is known or can be approximated and it is compared to approaches by other workers.
1.7K
Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine.
TL;DR: Results are presented evaluating reliability and accuracy of dockings compared with crystallographic experimental results on 81 protein/ligand pairs of substantial structural diversity, and assessing Surflex's utility as a screening tool on two protein targets using data sets on which competing methods were run.
1.3K