Fusion of 3D LIDAR and Camera Data for Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicle Applications
TL;DR: A novel object detection and identification method that fuses the complementary information obtained by two types of sensors, 3D LIDAR and vision cameras, that meets the real-time demand of autonomous vehicles.
read more
Abstract: It is vital that autonomous vehicles acquire accurate and real-time information about objects in their vicinity, which fully guarantees the safety of the passengers and vehicle in various environments. Three-dimensional light detection and ranging (3D LIDAR) sensors can directly obtain the position and geometric structure of an object within its detection range, whereas the use of vision cameras is most suitable for object recognition. Accordingly, in this paper, we present a novel object detection and identification method that fuses the complementary information obtained by two types of sensors. First, we utilise 3D LIDAR data to generate accurate object-region proposals. Then, these candidates are mapped onto the image space from which regions of interest (ROI) of the proposals are selected and input to a convolutional neural network (CNN) for further object recognition. To precisely identify the sizes of all the objects, we combine the features of the last three layers of the CNN to extract multi-scale features from the ROIs. The evaluation results obtained on the KITTI dataset demonstrate that: (1) unlike sliding windows that produce thousands of candidate object-region proposals, 3D LIDAR provides an average of 86 real candidates per frame and the minimal recall rate is better than 95%, which greatly decreases the extraction time; (2) The average processing time for each frame of the proposed method is only 66.79 ms, which meets the real-time demand of autonomous vehicles; (3) The average identification accuracies of our method for cars and pedestrians at a moderate level of difficulty are 89.04% and 78.18%, respectively, which is better than those of most previous methods.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Information Fusion-Based Fault Diagnosis Method Using Synthetic Indicator
01 Mar 2023
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors proposed a new synthetic indicator which can effectively eliminate the conflicts between evidences, which is composed of two indexes: measurement index of indirect conflicts and that of the evidence's information itself.
Review of Object Detection Techniques for Autonomous Vehicles: Trends and Future Prospects
Preeti,Chhavi Rana +1 more
- 30 Jul 2025
TL;DR: This review discusses state-of-the-art object detection techniques for autonomous vehicles, covering LiDAR-based methods, YOLO algorithms, and datasets, highlighting their importance for safe and efficient autonomous driving with average precision rates of over 90%.
RANSAC-Based Planar Point Cloud Segmentation Enhanced by Normal Vector and Maximum Principal Curvature Clustering
Yibo Ling,Yuli Wang,Ting On Chan +2 more
TL;DR: RANSAC-based planar point cloud segmentation enhanced by normal vector and maximum principal curvature clustering achieves higher accuracy and speed by reducing interference and refining the segmentation process.
Research on a data fusion scheme for a depth camera and LIDAR of mobile robot based on depth completion
Daoding Hong,Yingfu Wang,Xin Cheng,Zengxiang Zhou +3 more
- 19 Oct 2023
TL;DR: To better achieve the robot's recognition of specific targets, the two information sources were fused and point cloud data with RGB information was obtained and the method of computer graphics meets the expectations better based on the fact that it have a larger number of point clouds.
A Study on Highway Driving Assist Evaluation Method Using the Theoretical Formula and Dual Cameras
Bong-Ju Kim,Seon-Bong Lee +1 more
TL;DR: This study proposes a method to evaluate Highway Driving Assist systems using a theoretical formula and dual cameras, reducing testing time, effort, and cost, with maximum errors within 10% in actual vehicle testing.
References
•Proceedings Article
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Karen Simonyan,Andrew Zisserman +1 more
- 04 Sep 2014
TL;DR: This work investigates the effect of the convolutional network depth on its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting using an architecture with very small convolution filters, which shows that a significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by pushing the depth to 16-19 weight layers.
102.6K
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Jia Deng,Wei Dong,Richard Socher,Li-Jia Li,Kai Li,Li Fei-Fei +5 more
- 20 Jun 2009
TL;DR: A new database called “ImageNet” is introduced, a large-scale ontology of images built upon the backbone of the WordNet structure, much larger in scale and diversity and much more accurate than the current image datasets.
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
TL;DR: This work introduces a Region Proposal Network (RPN) that shares full-image convolutional features with the detection network, thus enabling nearly cost-free region proposals and further merge RPN and Fast R-CNN into a single network by sharing their convolutionAL features.
•Proceedings Article
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Karen Simonyan,Andrew Zisserman +1 more
- 01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the effect of the convolutional network depth on its accuracy in the large-scale image recognition setting and showed that a significant improvement on the prior-art configurations can be achieved by pushing the depth to 16-19 layers.
51.9K
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Joseph Redmon,Santosh K. Divvala,Ross Girshick,Ali Farhadi +3 more
- 27 Jun 2016
TL;DR: Compared to state-of-the-art detection systems, YOLO makes more localization errors but is less likely to predict false positives on background, and outperforms other detection methods, including DPM and R-CNN, when generalizing from natural images to other domains like artwork.