Journal Article10.48550/arxiv.2308.16444
Frank-Wolfe algorithm for DC optimization problem
TL;DR: It is established that all limit points of the generated sequence for the second version of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm are stationary points for the problem under consideration, and the rate of convergence for the duality gap is ${\cal O}(1/\sqrt{k})$.
read more
Abstract: In the present paper, we formulate two versions of Frank--Wolfe algorithm or conditional gradient method to solve the DC optimization problem with an adaptive step size. The DC objective function consists of two components; the first is thought to be differentiable with a continuous Lipschitz gradient, while the second is only thought to be convex. The second version is based on the first and employs finite differences to approximate the gradient of the first component of the objective function. In contrast to past formulations that used the curvature/Lipschitz-type constant of the objective function, the step size computed does not require any constant associated with the components. For the first version, we established that the algorithm is well-defined of the algorithm and that every limit point of the generated sequence is a stationary point of the problem. We also introduce the class of weak-star-convex functions and show that, despite the fact that these functions are non-convex in general, the rate of convergence of the first version of the algorithm to minimize these functions is ${\cal O}(1/k)$. The finite difference used to approximate the gradient in the second version of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm is computed with the step-size adaptively updated using two previous iterations. Unlike previous applications of finite difference in the Frank-Wolfe algorithm, which provided approximate gradients with absolute error, the one used here provides us with a relative error, simplifying the algorithm analysis. In this case, we show that all limit points of the generated sequence for the second version of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm are stationary points for the problem under consideration, and we establish that the rate of convergence for the duality gap is ${\cal O}(1/\sqrt{k})$.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Amir Beck,Marc Teboulle +1 more
TL;DR: A new fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm (FISTA) which preserves the computational simplicity of ISTA but with a global rate of convergence which is proven to be significantly better, both theoretically and practically.
14.3K
•Book
Optimization and nonsmooth analysis
Frank H. Clarke
- 01 Jan 1983
TL;DR: The Calculus of Variations as discussed by the authors is a generalization of the calculus of variations, which is used in many aspects of analysis, such as generalized gradient descent and optimal control.
•Proceedings Article
Revisiting Frank-Wolfe: Projection-Free Sparse Convex Optimization
Martin Jaggi
- 16 Jun 2013
TL;DR: A new general framework for convex optimization over matrix factorizations, where every Frank-Wolfe iteration will consist of a low-rank update, is presented, and the broad application areas of this approach are discussed.
Cubic regularization of Newton method and its global performance
Yurii Nesterov,Boris T. Polyak +1 more
TL;DR: This paper provides theoretical analysis for a cubic regularization of Newton method as applied to unconstrained minimization problem and proves general local convergence results for this scheme.
1.2K