Journal Article10.1016/J.DENTAL.2007.05.013
Flexural strength and Weibull analysis of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3- and 4-point bending tests.
175
TL;DR: Despite the large difference in average filler size between the composites, the volume fraction of the filler in both materials is similar, which was probably the reason for similar mean flexural strength values and fracture behavior.
read more
About: This article is published in Dental Materials. The article was published on 01 Mar 2008. The article focuses on the topics: Flexural strength & Three point flexural test.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Degradation, Fatigue, and Failure of Resin Dental Composite Materials
TL;DR: The intent of this article is to review the numerous factors that affect the mechanical properties of particle- or fiber-filler-containing indirect dental resin composite materials, and the effects of degradation due to aging in different media, cyclic loading, and mixed-mode loading on flexure strength and fracture toughness.
594
Nanotechnology in dentistry: Present and future perspectives on dental nanomaterials.
Klaus D. Jandt,David C. Watts +1 more
TL;DR: Dental nanomaterials have potential for the future but currently do not always exhibit superior properties, for example in clinical situations, so their strengths, limitations and their specific benefits will be better appreciated.
163
Nanofilled Resin Composite Properties and Clinical Performance: A Review
TL;DR: Mechanical properties of nanocomposites are generally comparable to those of hybrid composites but higher than microfilled composites, and clinical performance was comparable to that of hybrid Composites.
154
Microstructural characterization and fracture behavior of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite
TL;DR: The microstructural organization of the composites determines their physical properties, in spite of the similar filler content, and in contrast, the microstructure did not influence the fracture behavior and the structural reliability of these highly filled composites.
146
Factors Involved in Mechanical Fatigue Degradation of Dental Resin Composites
TL;DR: This review of fatigue mechanisms occurring during fatigue, on the methods used to assess them, and on additional phenomena involved in the degradation of initial mechanical properties of resin composites show that microstructural features are important in determining strength and fracture toughness.
References
An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials
TL;DR: The dental nanocomposite system studied showed high translucency, high polish and polish retention similar to those of microfills while maintaining physical properties and wear resistance equivalent to several hybrid composites.
1K
The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites
TL;DR: Both filler morphology and filler loading influenced flexural strength, flexural modulus, hardness, and fracture toughness of contemporary composites.
597
Perspectives on strength.
TL;DR: It is emphasized that an understanding of actual clinical failure modes is absolutely necessary before results of in vitro strength testing can be considered to have clinical validity.
264
Weibull analysis and flexural strength of hot-pressed core and veneered ceramic structures.
TL;DR: To test the hypothesis that the Weibull moduli of single- and multilayer ceramics are controlled primarily by the structural reliability of the core ceramic, seven groups of 20 bar specimens were made from the following materials.
246
Nanotechnology for dental composites
Norbert Moszner,Simone Klapdohr +1 more
TL;DR: In dentistry, composites consisting of inorganic fillers such as radiopaque glass, quartz or ceramic particles and an organic resin matrix based on a mixture of dimethacrylates, are used for the restoration of teeth as mentioned in this paper.
219