Journal Article10.1111/J.1540-6261.1994.TB00086.X
Financial Distress and Corporate Performance
Tim C. Opler,Sheridan Titman +1 more
TL;DR: This paper found that firms in the top leverage decile in industries that experience output contractions see their sales decline by 26 percent more than do those in the bottom level of leverage, and a similar decline takes place in the market value of equity.
read more
Abstract: This study finds that highly leveraged firms lose substantial market share to their more conservatively financed competitors in industry downturns. Specifically, firms in the top leverage decile in industries that experience output contractions see their sales decline by 26 percent more than do firms in the bottom leverage decile. A similar decline takes place in the market value of equity. These findings are consistent with the view that the indirect costs of financial distress are significant and positive. Consistent with the theory that firms with specialized products are especially vulnerable to financial distress, we find that highly leveraged firms that engage in research and development suffer the most in economically distressed periods. We also find that the adverse consequences of leverage are more pronounced in concentrated industries. FINANCIAL ECONOMISTS HAVE NOT reached a consensus on how financial distress affects corporate performance. Traditionally, the financial economics literature has portrayed financial distress as a costly event whose possibility is important in determining firms' optimal capital structures. Financial distress is seen as costly because it creates a tendency for firms to do things that are harmful to debtholders and nonfinancial stakeholders (i.e., customers, suppliers, and employees), impairing access to credit and raising costs of stakeholder relationships.1 In addition, financial distress can be costly if a firm's weakened condition induces an aggressive response by competitors seizing the opportunity to gain market share.2 More recent articles have
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The security price effects of public debt defaults
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined security returns around a sample of public debt defaults, only some of which end in bankruptcy, and provided new evidence on the costs and benefits of bankruptcy compared with workouts.
10
Accounting Fundamentals and Systematic Risk: Corporate Failure over the Business Cycle
TL;DR: The authors developed a forward-looking measure of systematic risk associated with corporate failure using firm fundamentals and found that for stocks in the top quintile of distress, a median hedge portfolio based on their measure generates 10-12% per annum, suggesting that their approach successfully extracts risk information from accounting data.
10
Do country or firm-specific factors matter more to R&D spending in firms?
Rajabrata Banerjee,Kartick Gupta +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a comprehensive dataset, which consists of 94,178 firm-year observations covering 42 countries and spanning 1981-2013, was used to examine the extent to which firm, industry and country-level factors explain firm-level R&D spending.
10
Financial distress, short sale constraints, and mispricing
TL;DR: In this article, the extent of the distress puzzle differs according to the degree of mispricing and short sale constraints, and the authors find that the distress puzzles observed for overpriced stocks, not for underpriced stocks becomes insignificant after adjustment for short-sale constraints due to an asymmetric pricing effect.
10
Managerial Compensation in Multi-Division Firms
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used hand collected data on division manager (DM) pay contracts and found that DM pay is related to the performance of both their division and the other divisions in the firm.
10
References
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
TL;DR: In this article, the authors draw on recent progress in the theory of property rights, agency, and finance to develop a theory of ownership structure for the firm, which casts new light on and has implications for a variety of issues in the professional and popular literature.
61.3K
Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have
TL;DR: In this paper, a firm that must issue common stock to raise cash to undertake a valuable investment opportunity is considered, and an equilibrium model of the issue-invest decision is developed under these assumptions.
17.6K
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns
Eugene F. Fama,Kenneth R. French +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, Bhandari et al. found that the relationship between market/3 and average return is flat, even when 3 is the only explanatory variable, and when the tests allow for variation in 3 that is unrelated to size.
15.9K
Determinants of corporate borrowing
TL;DR: In this article, the authors predict that corporate borrowing is inversely related to the proportion of market value accounted for by real options and rationalize other aspects of corporate borrowing behavior, such as the practice of matching maturities of assets and debt liabilities.
14.6K
The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice
TL;DR: In this paper, the explanatory power of some of the recent theories of optimal capital structure is analyzed empirically and a factor-analytic technique is used to mitigate the measurement problems encountered when working with proxy variables.
6.2K