Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information.
William Hart,Dolores Albarracín,Alice H. Eagly,Inge Brechan,Matthew J. Lindberg,Lisa A. Merrill +5 more
TL;DR: A meta-analysis assessed whether exposure to information is guided by defense or accuracy motives, and found an uncongeniality bias emerged when uncongsenial information was relevant to accomplishing a current goal.
read more
Abstract: A meta-analysis assessed whether exposure to information is guided by defense or accuracy motives. The studies examined information preferences in relation to attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors in situations that provided choices between congenial information, which supported participants' pre-existing attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors, and uncongenial information, which challenged these tendencies. Analyses indicated a moderate preference for congenial over uncongenial information (d=0.36). As predicted, this congeniality bias was moderated by variables that affect the strength of participants' defense motivation and accuracy motivation. In support of the importance of defense motivation, the congeniality bias was weaker when participants' attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors were supported prior to information selection; when participants' attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors were not relevant to their values or not held with conviction; when the available information was low in quality; when participants' closed-mindedness was low; and when their confidence in the attitude, belief, or behavior was high. In support of the importance of accuracy motivation, an uncongeniality bias emerged when uncongenial information was relevant to accomplishing a current goal.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health.
TL;DR: This paper reviews literature to offer evidence for the prominence of psychological flexibility in understanding psychological health, and synthesizes work in emotion regulation, mindfulness and acceptance, social and personality psychology, and neuropsychology.
2.5K
Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory
Hugo Mercier,Dan Sperber +1 more
TL;DR: The hypothesis is that the function of reasoning is argumentative: It is to devise and evaluate arguments intended to persuade and is adaptive given the exceptional dependence of humans on communication and their vulnerability to misinformation.
•Journal Article
Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles
Abstract: Part I: Biological System. Caporael, Evolutionary Theory for Social and Cultural Psychology. Blascovich, Seery, Visceral and Somatic Indexes of Social Psychological Constructs: History, Principles, Propositions, and Case Studies. Ochsner, Social Cognitive Neuroscience: Historical Development, Core Principles, and Future Promise. Part II: Cognitive System. Dunning, Prediction: The Inside View. Roese, Sherman, Expectancy. Kruglanski, Sleeth-Keppler, The Principles of Social Judgment. Andersen, Moscowitz, Blair, Nosek, Automatic Thought. Fiedler, Information Ecology and the Explanation of Social Cognition and Behavior. Forster, Liberman, Knowledge Activation. Hilton, Causal Explanation: From Social Perception to Knowledge-Based Causal Attribution. Petty, Brinol, Tormala, Wegener, The Role of Metacognition in Social Judgment. Wyer, Jr. Principles of Mental Representation. Biernat, Eidelman, Standards. Shafir, Decisions Constructed Locally: Some Fundamental Principles of the Psychology of Decision Making. Liberman, Trope, Stephan, Psychological Distance. Part III: Personal Motivational System. Schwarz, Clore, Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences. Strack, Deutsch, The Role of Impulse in Social Behavior. Oyserman, Social Identity and Self-Regulation. Higgins, Value. Pittman, Zeigler, Basic Human Needs. Fishbach, Ferguson, The Goal Construct in Social Psychology. Baumeister, Schmeichel, Vohs, Self-Regulation and the Executive Function: The Self as Controlling Agent. Van Lange, De Cremer, Van Dijk, Van Vugt, Self-Interest and Beyond: Basic Principles of Social Interaction. Part IV: Interpersonal System. Maio, Haddock, Attitude Change. Simpson, Foundations of Interpersonal Trust. DeDreu, Beersma, Steinel, Van Kleef, The Psychology of Negotiation: Principles and Basic Processes. Semin, Grounding Communication: Synchrony. Shaver, Mikulincer, Attachment Theory and Research: Core Concepts, Basic Principles, Conceptual Bridges. Fiske, Berdahl, Social Power. Part V: Group and Cultural System. Brewer, The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations: Social Categorization, Ingroup Bias, and Outgroup Prejudice. Hogg, Social Psychology of Leadership. Vallacher, Nowak, Dynamical Social Psychology: Finding Order in the Flow of Human Experience. Levine, Kerr, Inclusion and Exclusion: Implications for Group Processes. Chiu, Hong, Cultural Processes: Basic Principles. Part VI: Applications of Social Psychology. Tyler, Jost, Psychology and the Law: Reconciling Normative and Descriptive Accounts of Social Justice and System Legitimacy. Rothman, Salovey, The Reciprocal Relation between Principles and Practice: Social Psychology and Health Behavior. Strauman, Costanzo, Jones, McLean, Merrill, Contributions of Social Psychology to Clinical Psychology: Three Views of a Research Frontier. Johnson, Pham, Johar, Consumer Behavior and Marketing. Tetlock, Psychology and Politics: The Challenges of Integrating Levels of Analysis in Social Science. Thompson, Pozner, Organizational Behavior. Snyder, Omoto, Social Action.
Media and Political Polarization
TL;DR: The authors examined if the emergence of more partisan media has contributed to political polarization and led Americans to support more partisan policies and candidates, and found no evidence for a causal link between more partisan messages and changing attitudes or behaviors.
1K
Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature
Joshua A. Tucker,Andrew M. Guess,Pablo Barberá,Cristian Vaccari,Cristian Vaccari,Alexandra A. Siegel,Alexandra A. Siegel,Sergey Sanovich,Denis Stukal,Brendan Nyhan +9 more
TL;DR: The authors provide an overview of the current state of the literature on the relationship between social media; political polarization; and political "disinformation", a term used to encompass a wide range of types of information about politics found online.
References
Evidence That the Production of Aversive Consequences Is Not Necessary to Create Cognitive Dissonance
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors hypothesized that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance, and that cognitive dissonances will occur even when aversive consequence are not produced, in contrast to I influential revision ofcognitive dissonance theory.
223
Untersuchungen zur Handlungs- und Affektpsychologie
Kurt Lewin
- 01 Dec 1927
TL;DR: In this paper, Labhardt et al. vertritt die Lehre yon der,,Wetlenbewegung": sie konstatieren,,in den Gesamtlebensprozessen des Weibes ein auf und nieder der wellenartigen Kurve with einer Acme kurz vor und einemWellental kürz nach der Menstruation".
220
The learning and forgetting of controversial material.
J. M. Levine,G. Murphy +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, five procommunist and five anticommunist students were presented with anti-Soviet and pro-Soviet paragraphs and tested for recall, and the learning and forgetting curves over a nine-week period showed that each group excelled in learning and retaining the ideas of the paragraph fitting the attitudes of the group, and memory divergence between groups increased with time.
211
Distribution of the standardized mean change effect size for meta-analysis on repeated measures
TL;DR: The distributional properties of the standardized mean change are examined, potential problems with the variance formulae given in Becker (1988) are discussed, and the use of an approximation is recommended.
205
Motivated Cognitive Processing and Attitude Change
TL;DR: The authors investigated cognitive processing and attitudes under different motivations and found that strong non-directional (accuracy) or directional (defensive, impression) motivation resulted in extensive objective processing.
204