Faune de France
TL;DR: Five small groups of torieoptera which the author regards as constituting separate families are dealt with in the Faune de France series of monographs, well up to the standard of its predecessors.
read more
Abstract: We welcome the appearance of another instalment of the Faune de France series of monographs. The present contribution deals with five small groups of torieoptera which the author regards as constituting separate families. The most important of these are the Bruchidse, which comprise seven genera and sixty-eight species within the faunal limits of France. The Anthribidae are represented by six genera and twenty-one species. The genus Urodon, which has long been attached to this family, is placed by M. Hoffmann in a separate one of its own—the Urodonidae, transitional between the Rhynchophora and Phytophaga. Some modern authorities, it may be added, relegate it to the Bruchidae. Five species of the genus are included in the French fauna. The Brenthidae also come in for consideration. They comprise but a single French species Amorphocephalus coronatus, which lives in association with ants of the genus Camponotus. Finally, a separate family-the Nemonychidae—is erected to replace the tribe Rhinomacerini of the Curculionidae. It is considered transitional in structure between the last-named and the Scolytidae. Three genera, each with a single species, are included within the faunal limits. The work, as a whole, is well up to the standard of its predecessors; it is adequately illustrated, the figures of the species of Anthribidae being particularly effective, and there is the usual compendium of diagnostic keys to the genera and species dealt with. Faune de France 44: Coleopteres Bruchides et Anthribides. Par Adolphe Hoffmann. (Federation francaise des Societes de Sciences naturelles: Office central de faunistique.) Pp. 184. (Paris: Paul Lechevalier et fils, 1945.) 260 francs.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Seasonal changes of invertebrate fauna associated with Cystoseira barbata facies of Southeastern Black Sea coast
TL;DR: This research was carried out to determine the invertebrate fauna associated with Cystoseira barbata facies distributed in the upper-infralittoral zone of the Southeastern Black Sea coasts and their bioecological features.
Oxydromus Grube, 1855 reinstated over Ophiodromus Sars, 1862 (Polychaeta, Hesionidae)
TL;DR: Oxydromus Grube, 1855 must be reinstated for this hesionid polychaete genus because it is an incorrect subsequent spelling for Ocydromus Wagler, 1830 (Aves, Gruiformes, Rallidae) and is not an available name.
The Euscorpius tergestinus (C.L. Koch, 1837) complex in Italy: Biometrics of sympatric hidden species (Scorpiones: Euscorpiidae)
TL;DR: The morphological analysis of specimens belonging to both genotypes with the aim of identifying morphological characteristics able to discriminate between the two taxa confirms the presence in Italy of two different cryptic species belonging to the “ Euscorpius tergestinus ” complex.
Studies on the biology of the kelp-fly Coelopa in Great Britain
TL;DR: The occurrence of Coelopa was plotted around the mainland of Great Britain and was found to be made up of an irregular distributed series of colonies each centred upon a site of recurrent deposition of ‘wrack-beds’.