Journal Article10.1016/J.JECONOM.2012.08.011
Fat tails, VaR and subadditivity☆
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that the value-at-risk (VaR) portfolio measure is subadditive in the relevant tail region if asset returns are multivariate regularly varying, thus allowing for dependent returns.
read more
About: This article is published in Journal of Econometrics. The article was published on 01 Feb 2013. The article focuses on the topics: Subadditivity & Value at risk.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Modelling Dependence in High Dimensions with Factor Copulas
Dong Hwan Oh,Andrew J. Patton +1 more
TL;DR: Flexible new models for the dependence structure, or copula, of economic variables based on a latent factor structure with significant evidence of tail dependence, heterogeneous dependence, and asymmetric dependence are presented, with dependence being stronger in crashes than in booms.
What is the best risk measure in practice? A comparison of standard measures
TL;DR: In this article, the authors revisited commonly accepted desirable properties of risk measures like coherence, comonotonic additivity, robustness and elicitability, and found that there is no sufficient evidence to justify an all-inclusive replacement of ES by Expectiles in applications, especially as they provided an alternative way for backtesting of ES.
Risk Measures for Autocorrelated Hedge Fund Returns
Antonio Di Cesare,Philip A. Stork,Philip A. Stork,Casper G. de Vries,Casper G. de Vries,Casper G. de Vries +5 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors derived adjusted downside and global measures of individual and systemic risks of hedge funds and distinguish between normally and fat tailed distributed returns and show that adjustment is particularly relevant for downside risk measures in the case of fat tails.
Risk Measures for Autocorrelated Hedge Fund Returns
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors derive adjusted downside and global measures of individual and systemic risks for hedge funds and distinguish between normally and fat-tailed distributed returns and show that adjustment is particularly relevant for downside risk measures in the case of fat tails.
References
•Posted Content
Comparative Analyses of Expected Shortfall and Value-at-Risk: Their Estimation Error, Decomposition, and Optimization
Yasuhiro Yamai,Toshinao Yoshiba +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare expected shortfall with value-at-risk (VaR) in three aspects: estimation errors, decomposition into risk factors, and optimization, and show that expected shortfall is easily decomposed and optimized while VaR is not.
On the frequency of large stock returns: Putting booms and busts into perspective
TL;DR: In this article, the authors employ extreme value theory, focusing exclusively on the larger observations in order to assess the tail shape within a unified framework, which enables one to generate robust probabilities on large returns, which put the recent stock market swings into historical perspective.