Proceedings Article10.1145/3308560.3320086
Fairness-Aware Machine Learning: Practical Challenges and Lessons Learned
Sarah Bird,Ben Hutchinson,Krishnaram Kenthapadi,Emre Kiciman,Margaret Mitchell +4 more
- 13 May 2019
- pp 1297-1298
26
TL;DR: This tutorial aims to present an overview of algorithmic bias / discrimination issues observed over the last few years and the lessons learned, key regulations and laws, and evolution of techniques for achieving fairness in machine learning systems.
read more
Abstract: Researchers and practitioners from different disciplines have highlighted the ethical and legal challenges posed by the use of machine learned models and data-driven systems, and the potential for such systems to discriminate against certain population groups, due to biases in algorithmic decision-making systems. This tutorial aims to present an overview of algorithmic bias / discrimination issues observed over the last few years and the lessons learned, key regulations and laws, and evolution of techniques for achieving fairness in machine learning systems. We will motivate the need for adopting a “fairness-first” approach (as opposed to viewing algorithmic bias / fairness considerations as an afterthought), when developing machine learning based models and systems for different consumer and enterprise applications. Then, we will focus on the application of fairness-aware machine learning techniques in practice, by highlighting industry best practices and case studies from different technology companies. Based on our experiences in industry, we will identify open problems and research challenges for the data mining / machine learning community.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search
TL;DR: This work presents a framework for quantifying and mitigating algorithmic bias in mechanisms designed for ranking individuals, typically used as part of web-scale search and recommendation systems, and is the first large-scale deployed framework for ensuring fairness in the hiring domain.
317
The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry
Adam M Chekroud,Julia Bondar,Jaime Delgadillo,Gavin Doherty,Akash R. Wasil,Marjolein Fokkema,Zachary D. Cohen,Danielle Belgrave,Robert J. DeRubeis,Raquel Iniesta,Dominic B. Dwyer,Karmel W. Choi +11 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a review of the use of machine learning to predict treatment outcomes in psychiatry, ranging from medications and psychotherapies to digital interventions and neurobiological treatments.
293
Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search
Sahin Cem Geyik,Stuart MacDonald Ambler,Krishnaram Kenthapadi +2 more
- 25 Jul 2019
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a framework for quantifying and mitigating algorithmic bias in mechanisms designed for ranking individuals, typically used as part of web-scale search and recommendation systems.
266
Considerations for AI fairness for people with disabilities
Shari Trewin,Sara H. Basson,Michael Muller,Stacy M. Branham,Jutta Treviranus,Daniel M. Gruen,Daniel Hebert,Natalia Lyckowski,Erich Manser +8 more
- 06 Dec 2019
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss strategies for supporting fairness in the context of disability throughout the AI development lifecycle, and offer pointers into an established body of literature on human-centered design processes and philosophies that may assist AI and ML engineers in innovating algorithms that reduce harm and ultimately enhance the lives of people with disabilities.
120
Vamsa: Automated Provenance Tracking in Data Science Scripts
Mohammad Hossein Namaki,Avrilia Floratou,Fotis Psallidas,Subru Krishnan,Ashvin Agrawal,Yinghui Wu,Yiwen Zhu,Markus Weimer +7 more
- 23 Aug 2020
TL;DR: This work introduces the ML provenance tracking problem: the fundamental idea is to automatically track which columns in a dataset have been used to derive the features/labels of an ML model, and presents Vamsa, a modular system that extracts provenance from Python scripts without requiring any changes to the users' code.
56
References
•Proceedings Article
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning
Moritz Hardt,Eric Price,Nathan Srebro +2 more
- 05 Dec 2016
TL;DR: This work proposes a criterion for discrimination against a specified sensitive attribute in supervised learning, where the goal is to predict some target based on available features and shows how to optimally adjust any learned predictor so as to remove discrimination according to this definition.
Fairness through awareness
Cynthia Dwork,Moritz Hardt,Toniann Pitassi,Omer Reingold,Richard S. Zemel +4 more
- 08 Jan 2012
TL;DR: A framework for fair classification comprising a (hypothetical) task-specific metric for determining the degree to which individuals are similar with respect to the classification task at hand and an algorithm for maximizing utility subject to the fairness constraint, that similar individuals are treated similarly is presented.
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
TL;DR: This article showed that applying machine learning to ordinary human language results in human-like semantic biases and replicated a spectrum of known biases, as measured by the Implicit Association Test, using a widely used, purely statistical machine-learning model trained on a standard corpus of text from the World Wide Web.
•Posted Content
Fairness Through Awareness
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a framework for fair classification comprising a task-specific metric for determining the degree to which individuals are similar with respect to the classification task at hand, and an algorithm for maximizing utility subject to the fairness constraint that similar individuals are treated similarly.
2.8K
•Proceedings Article
Learning Fair Representations
Rich Zemel,Yu Wu,Kevin Swersky,Toni Pitassi,Cynthia Dwork +4 more
- 16 Jun 2013
TL;DR: A learning algorithm for fair classification that achieves both group fairness (the proportion of members in a protected group receiving positive classification is identical to the proportion in the population as a whole), and individual fairness (similar individuals should be treated similarly).
1.8K