Proceedings Article10.1145/3289600.3291383
Fairness-Aware Machine Learning: Practical Challenges and Lessons Learned
Sarah Bird,Krishnaram Kenthapadi,Emre Kiciman,Margaret Mitchell +3 more
- 30 Jan 2019
- pp 834-835
65
TL;DR: This tutorial aims to present an overview of algorithmic bias / discrimination issues observed over the last few years and the lessons learned, key regulations and laws, and evolution of techniques for achieving fairness in machine learning systems.
read more
Abstract: Researchers and practitioners from different disciplines have highlighted the ethical and legal challenges posed by the use of machine learned models and data-driven systems, and the potential for such systems to discriminate against certain population groups, due to biases in algorithmic decision-making systems. This tutorial aims to present an overview of algorithmic bias / discrimination issues observed over the last few years and the lessons learned, key regulations and laws, and evolution of techniques for achieving fairness in machine learning systems. We will motivate the need for adopting a "fairness-first" approach (as opposed to viewing algorithmic bias / fairness considerations as an afterthought), when developing machine learning based models and systems for different consumer and enterprise applications. Then, we will focus on the application of fairness-aware machine learning techniques in practice, by presenting case studies from different technology companies. Based on our experiences in industry, we will identify open problems and research challenges for the data mining / machine learning community.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry
Adam M Chekroud,Julia Bondar,Jaime Delgadillo,Gavin Doherty,Akash R. Wasil,Marjolein Fokkema,Zachary D. Cohen,Danielle Belgrave,Robert J. DeRubeis,Raquel Iniesta,Dominic B. Dwyer,Karmel W. Choi +11 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a review of the use of machine learning to predict treatment outcomes in psychiatry, ranging from medications and psychotherapies to digital interventions and neurobiological treatments.
293
Machine Learning in Mental Health: A Systematic Review of the HCI Literature to Support the Development of Effective and Implementable ML Systems
TL;DR: This article presents an introduction to, and a systematic review of, current ML work regarding psycho-socially based mental health conditions from the computing and HCI literature, and reflects on the current state-of-the-art of ML work for mental health.
279
Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search
Sahin Cem Geyik,Stuart MacDonald Ambler,Krishnaram Kenthapadi +2 more
- 25 Jul 2019
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a framework for quantifying and mitigating algorithmic bias in mechanisms designed for ranking individuals, typically used as part of web-scale search and recommendation systems.
266
Considerations for AI fairness for people with disabilities
Shari Trewin,Sara H. Basson,Michael Muller,Stacy M. Branham,Jutta Treviranus,Daniel M. Gruen,Daniel Hebert,Natalia Lyckowski,Erich Manser +8 more
- 06 Dec 2019
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss strategies for supporting fairness in the context of disability throughout the AI development lifecycle, and offer pointers into an established body of literature on human-centered design processes and philosophies that may assist AI and ML engineers in innovating algorithms that reduce harm and ultimately enhance the lives of people with disabilities.
120
Embracing Large Language Models for Medical Applications: Opportunities and Challenges
TL;DR: In this article , the authors provide a comprehensive overview of key aspects for the successful implementation of large language models in medicine, including transfer learning, domain-specific fine-tuning, domain adaptation, reinforcement learning with expert input, dynamic training, interdisciplinary collaboration, education and training, evaluation metrics, clinical validation, ethical considerations, data privacy, and regulatory frameworks.
References
Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification
Joy Buolamwini,Timnit Gebru +1 more
- 21 Jan 2018
TL;DR: It is shown that the highest error involves images of dark-skinned women, while the most accurate result is for light-skinned men, in commercial API-based classifiers of gender from facial images, including IBM Watson Visual Recognition.
•Proceedings Article
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning
Moritz Hardt,Eric Price,Nathan Srebro +2 more
- 05 Dec 2016
TL;DR: This work proposes a criterion for discrimination against a specified sensitive attribute in supervised learning, where the goal is to predict some target based on available features and shows how to optimally adjust any learned predictor so as to remove discrimination according to this definition.
Fairness through awareness
Cynthia Dwork,Moritz Hardt,Toniann Pitassi,Omer Reingold,Richard S. Zemel +4 more
- 08 Jan 2012
TL;DR: A framework for fair classification comprising a (hypothetical) task-specific metric for determining the degree to which individuals are similar with respect to the classification task at hand and an algorithm for maximizing utility subject to the fairness constraint, that similar individuals are treated similarly is presented.
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
TL;DR: This article showed that applying machine learning to ordinary human language results in human-like semantic biases and replicated a spectrum of known biases, as measured by the Implicit Association Test, using a widely used, purely statistical machine-learning model trained on a standard corpus of text from the World Wide Web.
•Posted Content
Fairness Through Awareness
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a framework for fair classification comprising a task-specific metric for determining the degree to which individuals are similar with respect to the classification task at hand, and an algorithm for maximizing utility subject to the fairness constraint that similar individuals are treated similarly.
2.8K