Journal Article10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00011-3
Experimental research in financial accounting
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe how specific streams of experimental financial accounting research have addressed questions about financial communication between managers, auditors, information intermediaries, and investors, and indicate how future research can extend those streams.
read more
Abstract: This paper uses recent experimental studies of financial accounting to illustrate our view of how such experiments can be conducted successfully. Rather than provide an exhaustive review of the literature, we focus on how particular examples illustrate successful use of experiments to determine how, when and (ultimately) why important features of financial accounting settings influence behavior. We first describe how changes in views of market efficiency, reliance on the experimentalist’s comparative advantage, new theories, and a focus on key institutional features have allowed researchers to overcome the criticisms of earlier financial accounting experiments. We then describe how specific streams of experimental financial accounting research have addressed questions about financial communication between managers, auditors, information intermediaries, and investors, and indicate how future research can extend those streams. We focus particularly on (1) how managers and auditors report information; (2) how users of financial information interpret those reports; (3) how individual decisions affect market behavior; and (4) how strategic interactions between information reporters and users can affect market outcomes. Our examples include and integrate experiments that fall into both the “behavioral” and “experimental economics” literatures in accounting. Finally, we discuss how experiments can be designed to be both effective and efficient.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Self-Serving Attribution Bias, Overconfidence, and the Issuance of Management Forecasts: overconfidence and forecast issuance
Robert Libby,Kristina Rennekamp +1 more
TL;DR: This article found that managers engage in self-serving attribution, giving greater weight to internal than external factors as explanations for good performance, which increases confidence in improved future performance and increases their willingness to issue forecasts.
237
Gathering Data for Archival, Field, Survey, and Experimental Accounting Research
TL;DR: In this paper, the complementary value of seven empirical methods that gather data in different ways: prestructured archives, unstructured (hand-collected) archives, field studies, field experiments, surveys, laboratory studies, and laboratory experiments.
235
Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective
Mark W. Nelson,Hun-Tong Tan +1 more
TL;DR: The authors classify extant auditing judgment and decision making literature as covering three broad areas: the audit task, the auditor and his/her attributes, and interaction between auditor and other stakeholders in task performance.
228
Predicting the next step of a random walk: experimental evidence of regime-shifting beliefs☆
TL;DR: Barberis et al. as discussed by the authors report two experiments with MBA-student participants that strongly support the existence of regime shifting beliefs and conclude that regime-shifting models can provide a useful framework for understanding market anomalies, including underreaction to earnings changes and overreactions to longterm earnings trends.
226
The Fleeting Effects of Disclosure Forthcomingness on Management's Reporting Credibility
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a theoretical framework and experimental evidence on how managers' disclosure decisions affect their credibility with investors, and they find that in the short-term, more forthcoming disclosure has a positive effect on management's reporting credibility, especially when management is forthcoming about negative news.
225
References
Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk
Daniel Kahneman,Amos Tversky +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develop an alternative model, called prospect theory, in which value is assigned to gains and losses rather than to final assets and in which probabilities are replaced by decision weights.
•Book
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Amos Tversky,Daniel Kahneman +1 more
- 01 Jan 1974
TL;DR: The authors described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: representativeness, availability of instances or scenarios, and adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available.
•Posted Content
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk
Daniel Kahneman,Amos Tversky +1 more
TL;DR: Prospect Theory as mentioned in this paper is an alternative theory of individual decision making under risk, developed for simple prospects with monetary outcomes and stated probabilities, in which value is given to gains and losses (i.e., changes in wealth or welfare) rather than to final assets, and probabilities are replaced by decision weights.
24.5K
Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work*
TL;DR: Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work Author(s): Eugene Fama Source: The Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Finance Association New York, N.Y. December, 28-30, 1969 (May, 1970), pp. 383-417 as mentioned in this paper