Journal Article10.1016/J.AJOG.2013.02.043
Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review.
Joshua D. Dahlke,Hector Mendez-Figueroa,Dwight J. Rouse,Vincenzo Berghella,Jason K. Baxter,Suneet P. Chauhan +5 more
226
TL;DR: Although 73 RCTs over the past 8 years is encouraging, additional well-designed, adequately powered trials on the specific technical aspects of CD are warranted.
read more
About: This article is published in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The article was published on 01 Oct 2013. The article focuses on the topics: Systematic review & Randomized controlled trial.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Evaluation of the Cesarean Scar Niche In Women With Secondary Infertility Undergoing ICSI Using 2D Sonohysterography Versus 3D Sonohysterography and Setting a Standard Criteria; Alalfy Simple Rules for Scar Assessment by Ultrasound To Prevent Health Problems for Women
Mahmoud Alalfy,Omneya M. Osman,Sameh Salama,Yossra Lasheen,Mahmoud Soliman,Mohamed Fikry,Mohamed A. Ramadan,Doaaa Alaa,Shaimaa Elshemy,Rana Abdella +9 more
TL;DR: 3D ultrasound with SHG is superior in evaluation of the RMT and niche width prior to ICSI providing better characterization of the scar niche, revealed.
References
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
•Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
49.6K
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher,Alessandro Liberati,Alessandro Liberati,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman test +4 more
TL;DR: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is introduced, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher,A. Liberati,J. Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman +3 more
TL;DR: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are crucial in healthcare, informing clinical practice guidelines and research funding decisions, but their value depends on transparent and clear reporting, highlighting the need for standardized guidelines like the PRISMA statement.
20.1K