Journal Article10.1016/J.AJOG.2013.02.043
Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review.
Joshua D. Dahlke,Hector Mendez-Figueroa,Dwight J. Rouse,Vincenzo Berghella,Jason K. Baxter,Suneet P. Chauhan +5 more
226
TL;DR: Although 73 RCTs over the past 8 years is encouraging, additional well-designed, adequately powered trials on the specific technical aspects of CD are warranted.
read more
About: This article is published in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The article was published on 01 Oct 2013. The article focuses on the topics: Systematic review & Randomized controlled trial.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Variations in uterine closure technique: an institutional survey of obstetricians and implications for patient counseling and prevention of adverse sequelae
TL;DR: The survey illustrates that various UCTs are performed irrespective of potential adverse sequelae and without consideration for subsequent patient counseling and care, and ongoing research must study the impact of UCT on scar healing to formulate preventive strategies for post-cesarean complications.
5
Fetal station at Caesarean section and risk of subsequent preterm birth - a cohort study
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors investigated the relationship between the station of the presenting fetal part and the surgical technique at first caesarean section and the risk of subsequent preterm birth.
5
FIGO good practice recommendations on surgical techniques to improve safety and reduce complications during cesarean delivery
Inês Nunes,Wanda Nicholson,Gerhard Theron +2 more
- 01 Oct 2023
TL;DR: FIGO's good practice recommendations for effective surgical techniques to reduce cesarean complications are presented and the management of two common bleeding problems following delivery of the placenta is concluded.
5
The Case for Standardizing Cesarean Delivery Technique
Joshua D. Dahlke,Hector Mendez-Figueroa,Lindsay Maggio,Jeffrey D. Sperling,Suneet P. Chauhan,D. J. Rouse +5 more
TL;DR: Standardized cesarean delivery technique based on evidence-based guidelines informed by numerous randomized trials and meta-analyses.
5
Changes in maternal and neonatal care after a quality improvement intervention in a sub-Saharan setting.
Francesco Cavallin,Donald Maziku,Rosalia Mkolomi,Gaetano Azzimonti,Fabio Manenti,Giovanni Putoto,Daniele Trevisanuto +6 more
TL;DR: The quality of care in maternal and neonatal care after a quality improvement intervention in a sub-Saharan setting resulted in substantial progress in most aspects of quality care, which coupled with a decrease in obstetric and perinatal mortality.
5
References
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
•Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
49.6K
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher,Alessandro Liberati,Alessandro Liberati,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman test +4 more
TL;DR: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is introduced, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher,A. Liberati,J. Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman +3 more
TL;DR: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are crucial in healthcare, informing clinical practice guidelines and research funding decisions, but their value depends on transparent and clear reporting, highlighting the need for standardized guidelines like the PRISMA statement.
20.1K