Evaluation of Current Eligibility Criteria for Bariatric Surgery Diabetes prevention and risk factor changes in the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study
Kajsa Sjöholm,Åsa Anveden,Markku Peltonen,Markku Peltonen,Peter Jacobson,Stefano Romeo,Per-Arne Svensson,Lars Sjöström,Lena M. S. Carlsson +8 more
TL;DR: The results show that strict BMI cutoffs are of limited use for bariatric surgery prioritization if the aim is to prevent diabetes and improve cardiovascular risk factors.
read more
Abstract: OBJECTIVE Patients with a BMI 2 and patients with a BMI between 35 and 40 kg/m 2 without comorbidities are noneligible by current eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery. We used Swedish obese subjects (SOS) to explore long-term outcomes in noneligible versus eligible patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The SOS study involved 2,010 obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery (68% vertical-banded gastroplasty, 19% banding, and 13% gastric bypass) and 2,037 contemporaneously matched obese controls receiving usual care. At inclusion, the participant age was 37–60 years and BMI was ≥34 kg/m 2 in men and ≥38 kg/m 2 in women. The effect of surgery was assessed in patients that do ( n = 3,814) and do not ( n = 233) meet current eligibility criteria. The date of analysis was 1 January 2012. The follow-up time was up to 20 years, with a median of 10 years. RESULTS Cardiovascular risk factors were significantly improved both in noneligible and eligible individuals after 10 years of follow-up. Surgery reduced the diabetes incidence in both the noneligible (adjusted hazard ratio 0.33 [95% CI 0.13–0.82], P = 0.017) and eligible (0.27 [0.22–0.33], P P value = 0.713). CONCLUSIONS Bariatric surgery drastically reduced the incidence of type 2 diabetes both in noneligible and eligible patients and improved cardiovascular risk factors in both groups. Our results show that strict BMI cutoffs are of limited use for bariatric surgery prioritization if the aim is to prevent diabetes and improve cardiovascular risk factors.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
American association of clinical endocrinologists and american college of endocrinology comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity.
W. Timothy Garvey,Jeffrey I. Mechanick,Elise M. Brett,Alan J. Garber,Daniel L. Hurley,Ania M. Jastreboff,Karl Nadolsky,Rachel Pessah-Pollack,Raymond A Plodkowski +8 more
TL;DR: The final recommendations recognize that obesity is a complex, adiposity-based chronic disease, where management targets both weight-related complications and adiposity to improve overall health and quality of life.
1.4K
Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures – 2019 update: cosponsored by american association of clinical endocrinologists/american college of endocrinology, the obesity society, american society for metabolic & bariatric surgery, obesity medicine association, and american society of anesthesiologists*
Jeffrey I. Mechanick,Caroline M. Apovian,Stacy A. Brethauer,W. Timothy Garvey,Aaron M. Joffe,Julie Kim,Robert F. Kushner,Richard Lindquist,Rachel Pessah-Pollack,Jennifer Seger,Richard D. Urman,Stephanie Adams,John B. Cleek,Riccardo Correa,M. Kathleen Figaro,Karen Flanders,Jayleen Grams,Daniel L. Hurley,Shanu N. Kothari,Michael V. Seger,Christopher D. Still +20 more
TL;DR: These updated clinical practice guidelines for bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity and clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease.
675
Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists.
Jeffrey I. Mechanick,Jeffrey I. Mechanick,Caroline M. Apovian,Stacy A. Brethauer,W. Timothy Garvey,W. Timothy Garvey,Aaron M. Joffe,Julie Kim,Robert F. Kushner,Richard Lindquist,Rachel Pessah-Pollack,Jennifer Seger,Richard D. Urman,Stephanie Adams,John B. Cleek,Riccardo Correa,M. Kathleen Figaro,Karen Flanders,Jayleen Grams,Jayleen Grams,Daniel L. Hurley,Shanu N. Kothari,Michael V. Seger,Christopher D. Still +23 more
TL;DR: Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity and clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease.
401
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures – 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists
Jeffrey I. Mechanick,Caroline M. Apovian,Stacy A. Brethauer,W. Timothy Garvey,Aaron M. Joffe,Julie Kim,Robert F. Kushner,Richard Lindquist,Rachel Pessah-Pollack,Jennifer Seger,Richard D. Urman,Stephanie Adams,John B. Cleek,Riccardo Correa,M. Kathleen Figaro,Karen Flanders,Jayleen Grams,Daniel L. Hurley,Shanu N. Kothari,Michael V. Seger,Christopher D. Still +20 more
TL;DR: The updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were developed by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists as mentioned in this paper.
226
Bariatric and metabolic surgery: a shift in eligibility and success criteria
TL;DR: For a holistic approach that focuses on the multifactorial effects of bariatric and metabolic surgery to be possible, a paradigm shift that goes beyond the pure semantics is needed and could lead to profound clinical implications for eligibility criteria and the definition of success of the surgical approach.
209
References
Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
Scott M. Grundy,David W. Bilheimer,Alan Chait,Luther T. Clark,Margo A. Denke,Richard J. Havel,William R. Hazzard,Stephen B. Hulley,Donald B. Hunninghake,Robert A. Kreisberg,Penny M. Kris-Etherton,James M. McKenney,Michael A. Newman,Ernst J. Schaefer,Burton E. Sobel,Carolyn Somelofski,Milton C. Weinstein,H. Bryan Brewer,James I. Cleeman,Karen A. Donato,Nancy D. Ernst,Jeffrey M. Hoeg,Basil M. Rifkind,Jacques E. Rossouw,Christopher T. Sempos,Joanne M. Gallivan,Maureen N. Harris,Laurie Quint-Adler +27 more
TL;DR: Dairy therapy remains the first line of treatment of high blood cholesterol, and drug therapy is reserved for patients who are considered to be at high risk for CHD, and the fundamental approach to treatment is comparable.
28.6K
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.
William C. Knowler,Elizabeth Barrett-Connor,Sarah E. Fowler,Richard F. Hamman,John M. Lachin,Elizabeth A. Walker,David M. Nathan +6 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared a lifestyle intervention with metformin to prevent or delay the development of Type 2 diabetes in nondiabetic individuals. And they found that the lifestyle intervention was significantly more effective than the medication.
19.4K
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National
William C. Taylor,Nigel Unwin +1 more
- 01 Jan 2009
15.4K
•Journal Article
Detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
Scott M. Grundy,Diane M. Becker,Luther T. Clark,Richard S. Cooper,Margo A. Denke,James P. Howard,Donald B. Hunninghake,D. Roger Illingworth,Russell V. Luepker,Patrick E. McBride,James M. McKenney,Richard C. Pasternak,Neil J. Stone,Linda Van Horn +13 more
12.9K
Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus
James R. Gavin,K. G M M Alberti,Mayer B. Davidson,Ralph A. DeFronzo,Allan Drash,Steven G. Gabbe,Saul M. Genuth,Maureen I. Harris,Richard Kahn,Harry Keen,William C. Knowler,Harold E. Lebovitz,Noel K. Maclaren,Jerry P. Palmer,Philip Raskin,Robert A. Rizza,Michael P. Stern +16 more
TL;DR: It was deemed essential to develop an appropriate, uniform terminology and a functional, working classification of diabetes that reflects the current knowledge about the disease.
12.3K
Related Papers (5)
Lars Sjöström,Kristina Narbro,C. David Sjöström,Kristjan Karason,B Larsson,Hans Wedel,Theodore Lystig,Marianne Sullivan,Claude Bouchard,Björn Carlsson,Calle Bengtsson,Sven Dahlgren,Anders Gummesson,Peter Jacobson,Jan Karlsson,Anna Karin Lindroos,Hans Lönroth,Ingmar Näslund,Torsten Olbers,Kaj Stenlöf,Jarl S Torgerson,Göran Ågren,Lena M. S. Carlsson +22 more