Evaluating the stationarity assumption in statistically downscaled climate projections: is past performance an indicator of future results?
Keith W. Dixon,John R. Lanzante,Mary Jo Nath,Katharine Hayhoe,Anne M. K. Stoner,Aparna Radhakrishnan,Venkatramani Balaji,Carlos F. Gaitan +7 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a "perfect model" experimental design that quantifies aspects of ESD method performance for both historical and late 21st century time periods, and demonstrate that violations of the stationarity assumption can vary geographically, seasonally, and with the amount of projected climate change.
read more
Abstract: Empirical statistical downscaling (ESD) methods seek to refine global climate model (GCM) outputs via processes that glean information from a combination of observations and GCM simulations. They aim to create value-added climate projections by reducing biases and adding finer spatial detail. Analysis techniques, such as cross-validation, allow assessments of how well ESD methods meet these goals during observational periods. However, the extent to which an ESD method’s skill might differ when applied to future climate projections cannot be assessed readily in the same manner. Here we present a “perfect model” experimental design that quantifies aspects of ESD method performance for both historical and late 21st century time periods. The experimental design tests a key stationarity assumption inherent to ESD methods – namely, that ESD performance when applied to future projections is similar to that during the observational training period. Case study results employing a single ESD method (an Asynchronous Regional Regression Model variant) and climate variable (daily maximum temperature) demonstrate that violations of the stationarity assumption can vary geographically, seasonally, and with the amount of projected climate change. For the ESD method tested, the greatest challenges in downscaling daily maximum temperature projections are revealed to occur along coasts, in summer, and under conditions of greater projected warming. We conclude with a discussion of the potential use and expansion of the perfect model experimental design, both to inform the development of improved ESD methods and to provide guidance on the use of ESD products in climate impacts analyses and decision-support applications.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Christopher M. Bishop
- 01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Probability distributions of linear models for regression and classification are given in this article, along with a discussion of combining models and combining models in the context of machine learning and classification.
10.1K
Eutrophication will increase during the 21st century as a result of precipitation changes.
TL;DR: It is shown that climate change–induced precipitation changes alone will substantially increase riverine total nitrogen loading within the continental United States by the end of the century for the “business-as-usual” scenario, and would require a 33 ± 24% reduction in nitrogen inputs, representing a massive management challenge.
881
Bias Correcting Climate Change Simulations - a Critical Review
Douglas Maraun
- 10 Oct 2016
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a stochastic model for bias correction of global and regional climate models, which is based on the assumption that the considered climate model produces skillful input for a bias correction, including a plausible representation of climate change.
Multivariate quantile mapping bias correction: an N-dimensional probability density function transform for climate model simulations of multiple variables
TL;DR: In this paper, an image processing technique designed to transfer colour information from one image to another is adapted for use as a multivariate bias correction algorithm (MBCn) for climate model projections/predictions of multiple climate variables.
Assessment of climate extremes in future projections downscaled by multiple statistical downscaling methods over Pakistan
Shaukat Ali,Hyung-Il Eum,Jaepil Cho,Li Dan,Firdos Khan,K. Dairaku,Madan L. Shrestha,Syewoon Hwang,Wajid Nasim,Imtiaz Ali Khan,Shah Fahad +10 more
TL;DR: In this article, a comprehensive outlook of observation and changes in climate extremes between the reference (1976-2005) and future periods (2020s: 2006-2035, 2050s: 2036-2065 and 2080s:2066-2095) was provided.
139
References
Methods for evaluating the regional hydrologic impacts of global climatic changes
TL;DR: The most profound effect of human-induced climate changes may be major alterations in regional hydrologic cycles and changes in regional water availability, which are among the least well-understood impacts.
392
Is bias correction of regional climate model (RCM) simulations possible for non-stationary conditions?
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate how well correction methods perform for conditions different from those used for calibration with the relatively simple differential split-sample test, and recommend using higher-skill correction methods such as distribution mapping.
•Book
Empirical-Statistical Downscaling
Rasmus E. Benestad,Inger Hanssen-Bauer,Deliang Chen +2 more
- 23 Sep 2008
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a downscaling strategy for predicting and pre-processing linear and non-linear techniques for forecasting and diagnostics in a weather generator using ESD.
338
Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe
TL;DR: It is concluded that utilising a variety of calibration methods on output from a wide range of AOGCMs is essential to produce climate data that will ensure robust and reliable crop yield projections.
317
Obtaining sub-grid-scale information from coarse-resolution general circulation model output
TL;DR: This paper explored the relationship between local temperature and precipitation and large-scale climate using regression analysis using monthly-mean data from Oregon, with separate analyses for each month, with independent verification, spatial-mean explained variances range from 58 to 87% for temperature and from 39 to 76% for precipitation.
296