Estratégias para estimular o uso de evidências científicas na tomada de decisão
Raphael Igor Dias,Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto,Tazio Vanni,Ana Maria Silveira Costa Candido,Luciana Hentzy Moraes,Maria Augusta Rodrigues Gomes +5 more
- 01 Sep 2015
- Vol. 23, Iss: 3, pp 316-322
TL;DR: Strategies to encourage the use of scientific evidence in health decision making can be implemented in a synergistic way; however, it is important to assess the local context and the implications of each strategy for the health system as a whole.
read more
Abstract: A major challenge for health systems is to promote the use of scientific evidence supporting public policies that seek to improve efficiency and the health of the population. The objective of this study was to identify and discuss strategies to encourage the use of scientific evidence in the process of health decision making. The search was performed in the repositories of the Virtual Health Library, Health Systems Evidence and PubMed. SUPPORT (Supporting Policy Relevant Reviews and Trials) Tools were used for the preparation of this overview. Seven systematic reviews were used to identify options to stimulate the use of evidence for decision making: 1) Produce policy briefings with adapted language for different audiences; 2) Stimulate the use of journalism and other forms of mass communication for dissemination of scientific knowledge; 3) Implement online platforms for dissemination of scientific knowledge, and; 4) Promote the dialogue between researchers and policy makers. Strategies to encourage the use of scientific evidence in health decision making can be implemented in a synergistic way; however, it is important to assess the local context and the implications of each strategy for the health system as a whole.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Organização e práticas da assistência farmacêutica em oncologia no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde
Mario Jorge Sobreira da Silva,Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio-de-Castro +1 more
- 30 May 2019
TL;DR: In this paper, a subunidade de analisar a organizacao e as praticas da assistencia farmaceutica em oncologia em cinco municipios brasileiros by meio de um estudo de casos multiplos, tendo o câncer de mama como condicao marcadora.
Parcerias para o Desenvolvimento Produtivo: um ensaio sobre a construção das listas de produtos estratégicos
Kellen Santos Rezende,Gabriela de Oliveira Silva,Flávia Caixeta Albuquerque +2 more
- 01 Nov 2019
TL;DR: In this paper, an ensaio sobre a construcao das listas de produtos estrategicos for o Sistema Unico de Saude brasileiro elegiveis for a apresentacao de propostas de projetos de Parcerias para o Desenvolvimento Produtivo (PDP) was presented.
Revisão realista como metodologia para utilização de evidências em políticas de saúde: uma revisão integrativa
TL;DR: A revisao realista is a metodologia of revisao integrativa as mentioned in this paper that, by meio de 11 fontes de dados, buscou estudos teorico-metodologicos, qualitativos, ou quantitativo, os quais analisaram ou propuseram teorias e/ou metodologies of revisão realista.
Perspectiva Latinoamericana del Modelo Conceptual Conocimiento en Acción de Knowledge Translation
Ivone Evangelista Cabral,Cristiane Cardoso de Paula +1 more
- 18 Mar 2020
TL;DR: The modelo conceptual de traduccion del conocimiento en accion as mentioned in this paper can be used to transform conocimento in accion with the participación del usuario del sistema de salud.
Melhoria da classificação das causas externas inespecíficas de mortalidade baseada na investigação do óbito no Brasil em 2017
Adauto Martins Soares Filho,Cíntia Honório Vasconcelos,Aglaêr A da Nóbrega,Isabella Vitral Pinto,Edgar Merchan-Hamann,Lenice Harumi Ishitani,Elisabeth Barboza França +6 more
TL;DR: As cidades do projeto obtiveram melhores resultados após investigaçao de CEI, possibilitando analisar a reclassificação para causas específicas, por sexo e faixas etárias.
References
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Beverley Shea,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,George A. Wells,Maarten Boers,Neil Andersson,Candyce Hamel,Ashley C Porter,Peter Tugwell,David Moher,Lex M. Bouter +9 more
TL;DR: A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed that consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
TL;DR: Timely access to good quality and relevant research evidence, collaborations with policymakers and relationship- and skills-building with policymakers are reported to be the most important factors in influencing the use of evidence.
Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review.
TL;DR: Interview studies with health policy-makers provide only limited support for commonly held beliefs about facilitators of, and barriers to, their use of evidence, and raise questions about commonsense proposals for improving the use of research for policy decisions.
1K
Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making.
TL;DR: A systematic review of studies of decision-making by health care managers and policy-makers and the websites of research funders, producers/purveyors of research, and journals that include them among their target audiences found that contextual factors were rarely highlighted, recommendations were often provided and graded entry formats were rarely used.
668
The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review.
TL;DR: To more effectively implement research informed public health policy, action is required by decision makers and researchers to address the barriers identified in this systematic review.