Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores
TL;DR: In this article, the authors considered the problem of estimating latent ability using the entire response pattern of free-response items, first in the general case and then in the case where the items are scored in a graded way, especially when the thinking process required for solving each item is assumed to be homogeneous.
read more
Abstract: Estimation of latent ability using the entire response pattern of free-response items is discussed, first in the general case and then in the case where the items are scored in a graded way, especially when the thinking process required for solving each item is assumed to be homogeneous.
The maximum likelihood estimator, the Bayes modal estimator, and the Bayes estimator obtained by using the mean-square error multiplied by the density function of the latent variate as the loss function are taken as our estimators. Sufficient conditions for the existence of a unique maximum likelihood estimator and a unique Bayes modal estimator are formulated with respect to an individual item rather than with respect to a whole set of items, which are useful especially in the situation where we are free to choose optimal items for a particular examinee out of the item library in which a sufficient number of items are stored with reliable quality controls.
Advantages of the present methods are investigated by comparing them with those which make use of conventional dichotomous items or test scores, theoretically as well as empirically, in terms of the amounts of information, the standard errors of estimators, and the mean-square errors of estimators. The utility of the Bayes modal estimator as a computational compromise for the Bayes estimator is also discussed and observed. The relationship between the formula for the item characteristic function and the philosophy of scoring is observed with respect to dichotomous items.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Examining personality—Job characteristic interactions in explaining work outcomes
TL;DR: In this article, the authors integrate the theory of purposeful work behavior with the job demands-resources model to examine how five-factor model personality traits interact with job resources and challenging job demands in explaining employee motivation and performance.
29
Student assessment via graded response model
TL;DR: In this article, an IRT model for ordered polytomous variables is considered in order to investigate the item properties and to evaluate the student achievement, and the results highlight the different composition of the items and provide a simple description of the student ability distribution.
Performance of Polytomous IRT Models With Rating Scale Data: An Investigation Over Sample Size, Instrument Length, and Missing Data
Shenghai Dai,Thao Thu Vo,Olasunkanmi James Kehinde,Haixia He,Yu Xue,Cihan Demir,Xiaolin Wang +6 more
TL;DR: The implementation of polytomous item response theory (IRT) models such as the graded response model (GRM) and the generalized partial credit model (GPCM) to inform instrument design and validation has been increasing across social and educational contexts where rating scales are usually used.
The Performance of Local Dependence Measures With Psychological Data
TL;DR: The violation of the assumption of local independence when applying item response theory (IRT) models has been shown to have a negative impact on all estimates obtained from the given model as mentioned in this paper.
28
Models for polytomous data
Francis Tuerlinckx,Wen-Chung Wang +1 more
- 01 Jan 2004
TL;DR: In the first two chapters of this volume, models for binary or dichotomous variables have been discussed as mentioned in this paper. But, in a wide range of psychological and sociological applications, it is very common to have data that are polytomous or multicategorical.
28
References
•Book
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores
Frederic M. Lord,Melvin R. Novick,Allan Birnbaum +2 more
- 01 Jan 1968
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a survey of test theory models and their application in the field of mental test analysis. But the focus of the survey is on test-score theories and models, and not the practical applications and limitations of each model studied.
8.5K
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.
Abstract: This is a reprint of the orginal book released in 1968. Our primary goal in this book is to sharpen the skill, sophistication, and in- tuition of the reader in the interpretation of mental test data, and in the construction and use of mental tests both as instruments of psychological theory and as tools in the practical problems of selection, evaluation, and guidance. We seek to do this by exposing the reader to some psychologically meaningful statistical theories of mental test scores. Although this book is organized in terms of test-score theories and models, the practical applications and limitations of each model studied receive substantial emphasis, and these discussions are presented in as nontechnical a manner as we have found possible. Since this book catalogues a host of test theory models and formulas, it may serve as a reference handbook. Also, for a limited group of specialists, this book aims to provide a more rigorous foundation for further theoretical research than has heretofore been available.One aim of this book is to present statements of the assumptions, together with derivations of the implications, of a selected group of statistical models that the authors believe to be useful as guides in the practices of test construction and utilization. With few exceptions we have given a complete proof for each major result presented in the book. In many cases these proofs are simpler, more complete, and more illuminating than those originally offered. When we have omitted proofs or parts of proofs, we have generally provided a reference containing the omitted argument. We have left some proofs as exercises for the reader, but only when the general method of proof has already been demonstrated. At times we have proved only special cases of more generally stated theorems, when the general proof affords no additional insight into the problem and yet is substantially more complex mathematically.
4.5K
Related Papers (5)
Frederic M. Lord,Melvin R. Novick,Allan Birnbaum +2 more
- 01 Jan 1968
Susan E. Embretson,Steven P. Reise +1 more
- 01 Jan 2000