1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Erratum: continuous variable quantum key distribution: finite-key analysis of composable security against coherent attacks" ?
In particular, the following sentences should be removed:. Instead the conclusion should be the following:. The authors compare it with key rates computed under the assumption of collective Gaussian attacks and find that they are significantly higher.. Their results for collective attacks suggest that an extension of the postselection technique to infinitedimensional systems ( see [ 25 ] for a proposal ) is desirable.
read more
![FIG. 2 (color online). Corrected version of Fig. 3. Key rate l=N versus losses secure against coherent attacks at N ¼ 109 (dot-dashed line), collective Gaussian attacks at N ¼ 109 (dashed line), and the Devetak-Winter rate [7] for perfect information reconciliation (solid line). Squeezing strength, error correction efficiency, and security parameters are chosen as in the case of coherent attacks.](/figures/fig-2-color-online-corrected-version-of-fig-3-key-rate-l-n-faz18ykp.png)
