Efficient meltwater drainage through supraglacial streams and rivers on the southwest Greenland ice sheet.
Laurence C. Smith,V. W. Chu,Kang Yang,Colin J. Gleason,Lincoln H. Pitcher,Asa K. Rennermalm,Carl J. Legleiter,A. Behar,Brandon T. Overstreet,S. Moustafa,Marco Tedesco,Richard R. Forster,A. L. LeWinter,David C. Finnegan,Yongwei Sheng,James Balog +15 more
TL;DR: Satellite and in situ technologies assess surface drainage conditions on the southwestern ablation surface after an extreme 2012 melting event conclude that the ice sheet surface is efficiently drained under optimal conditions, that digital elevation models alone cannot fully describe supraglacial drainage and its connection to subglacial systems, and that predicting outflow from climate models alone, without recognition of sub glacial processes, may overestimate true meltwater release from theIce sheet.
read more
Abstract: Thermally incised meltwater channels that flow each summer across melt-prone surfaces of the Greenland ice sheet have received little direct study. We use high-resolution WorldView-1/2 satellite mapping and in situ measurements to characterize supraglacial water storage, drainage pattern, and discharge across 6,812 km(2) of southwest Greenland in July 2012, after a record melt event. Efficient surface drainage was routed through 523 high-order stream/river channel networks, all of which terminated in moulins before reaching the ice edge. Low surface water storage (3.6 ± 0.9 cm), negligible impoundment by supraglacial lakes or topographic depressions, and high discharge to moulins (2.54-2.81 cm⋅d(-1)) indicate that the surface drainage system conveyed its own storage volume every <2 d to the bed. Moulin discharges mapped inside ∼52% of the source ice watershed for Isortoq, a major proglacial river, totaled ∼41-98% of observed proglacial discharge, highlighting the importance of supraglacial river drainage to true outflow from the ice edge. However, Isortoq discharges tended lower than runoff simulations from the Modele Atmospherique Regional (MAR) regional climate model (0.056-0.112 km(3)⋅d(-1) vs. ∼0.103 km(3)⋅d(-1)), and when integrated over the melt season, totaled just 37-75% of MAR, suggesting nontrivial subglacial water storage even in this melt-prone region of the ice sheet. We conclude that (i) the interior surface of the ice sheet can be efficiently drained under optimal conditions, (ii) that digital elevation models alone cannot fully describe supraglacial drainage and its connection to subglacial systems, and (iii) that predicting outflow from climate models alone, without recognition of subglacial processes, may overestimate true meltwater export from the ice sheet to the ocean.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Forcing and Responses of the Surface Energy Budget at Summit, Greenland
Nathaniel B. Miller,Matthew D. Shupe,Christopher J. Cox,David Noone,P. Ola G. Persson,Konrad Steffen +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the surface energy budget (SEB) terms at Summit, Greenland for the full annual cycle from July 2013 June 2014 and extend to longer periods for the radiative and turbulent SEB terms.
Pan-Greenland mapping of supraglacial rivers, lakes, and water-filled crevasses in a cool summer (2018) and a warm summer (2019)
Wensong Zhang,Kang Yang,Laurence C. Smith,Yuhan Wang,Dirk van As,Brice Noël,Yao Lu,Jinyu Liu +7 more
TL;DR: This study maps pan-Greenland surface water extent and volume for cool (2018) and warm (2019) summers, revealing strong interannual differences in total surface water area, volume, and mean elevation limit, with supraglacial rivers dominating surface water appearance.
9
The seasonal evolution of subglacial drainage pathways beneath a soft-bedded glacier
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors present a unique multi-year instrumented record of the development of seasonal subglacial behavior associated with an Icelandic temperate glacier resting on a deformable sediment layer.
References
Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology
TL;DR: The most important single factor involved in erosion phenomena and, in particular in connection with the development of stream systems and their drainage basins by aqueous erosion is called crossgrading.
Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology
TL;DR: In this paper, two general classes of descriptive numbers are presented: linear scale measurements and dimensionless numbers, usually angles or ratios of length measures, whereby the shapes of analogous units can be compared irrespective of scale.
5.8K
Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography.
TL;DR: The percentage hypsometric curve (area-altitude curve) as discussed by the authors relates horizontal cross-sectional area of a drainage basin to relative elevation above basin mouth, and is used to measure the sinuosity of form and proportionate area below the curve.
3.6K
•Book
The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications
Luna Bergere Leopold,Thomas Maddock +1 more
- 01 Jan 1953
TL;DR: In this paper, the hydraulic characteristics of stream channels are measured quantitatively and vary with discharge as simple power functions at a given river cross section, and similar variations in relation to discharge exist among the cross sections along the length of a river under the condition that discharge at all points is equal in frequency of occurrence.