Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources
TL;DR: Systematic reviews of complex evidence cannot rely solely on protocol-driven search strategies, and primary sources must be identified by “snowballing” or by personal knowledge or personal contacts.
read more
Abstract: Objective To describe where papers come from in a systematic review of complex evidence. Method Audit of how the 495 primary sources for the review were originally identified. Results Only 30% of sources were obtained from the protocol defined at the outset of the study (that is, from the database and hand searches). Fifty one per cent were identified by “snowballing” (such as pursuing references of references), and 24% by personal knowledge or personal contacts. Conclusion Systematic reviews of complex evidence cannot rely solely on protocol-driven search strategies.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Effectiveness of educational and lifestyle interventions to prevent paediatric obesity: systematic review and meta‐analyses of randomized and non‐randomized controlled trials
TL;DR: This review and meta‐analysis aim at updating a previous meta-analysis carried out by Waters et al. on the efficacy of interventions aimed at preventing childhood obesity and at identifying predictors of outcome.
40
Product and Organizational Modularity: A Contingent View of the Mirroring Hypothesis
TL;DR: In this article, a contingent view of the mirroring hypothesis is presented, focusing on the causal effect of product modularity on organizational modularity, and a set of six distinct, although interdependent, factors: component technological change and diversity, innovativeness of product architecture, complexity of product architectures, capability dispersion along the supply network, rivalry among leading firms and among suppliers, and logistics costs.
40
The effect of running on foot muscles and bones: A systematic review.
TL;DR: Results of relevant literature are limited and somewhat contradictory, and the outcome suggests that running may increase foot muscle volume, muscle cross-sectional area and bone density, but this seems to depend on training volume and experience.
40
Methods for documenting systematic review searches: a discussion of common issues.
TL;DR: With careful planning, documentation to fulfill the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses requirements can become a valuable tool for organizing a systematic review literature search and planning updates.
40
References
Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods:
TL;DR: An overview and critique of a selection of strategies for synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence, ranging from techniques that are largely qualitative and interpretive through to techniques that is largely quantitative and integrative.
1.9K
Competing interests: none declared.
Laurence J Hirsch
- 01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: a Executive Director, Medical Communications, Merck Research Laboratories, 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA (email: laurence_hirsch@merck.com).
Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review.
Trisha Greenhalgh,Glenn Robert,Fraser Macfarlane,Paul Bate,Olympia Kyriakidou,Richard Peacock +5 more
TL;DR: It is concluded that meta-narrative review adds value to the synthesis of heterogeneous bodies of literature, in which different groups of scientists have conceptualised and investigated the 'same' problem in different ways and produced seemingly contradictory findings.
881
•Book
Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations: A Systematic Literature Review
Trisha Greenhalgh,Glenn Robert,Paul Bate,Fraser Macfarlane,Olivia Kyriakidou +4 more
- 12 Mar 2007
TL;DR: This is a systematic review on how innovations in health service practice and organisation can be disseminated and implemented using a variety of research methods.
605
Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches
Pamela Royle,Ruairidh Milne +1 more
TL;DR: Analysis of sources searched in Cochrane reviews found that CCTR was the single best source of RCTs and contacting authors and manufacturers to find unpublished trials appeared to be a more effective method of obtaining the additional better quality trials.