Open Access
Effect of Head Rotation on Posteroanterior Cephalometric Radiographs
Chosun Univer
- 01 Jan 2002
4
TL;DR: To identify the potential projection errors of posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs due to head rotation in the vertical Z-axis, 20 human dry skull samples with permanent dentition were collected from the Department of Anatomy in the College of Medicine, Chosun University, Korea.
read more
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify the potential projection errors of posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs due to head rotation in the vertical Z-axis. For this investigation, 20 human dry skull samples with permanent dentition were collected from the Department of Anatomy in the College of Medicine, Chosun University, Korea. They had no gross asymmetries and were well preserved. Each dry skull was rotated from 08 to 6 108 at 18 intervals. A vertical axis, the Z-axis, was used as a rotational axis for the exposure of 420 posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Most of the abscissa values of each landmark showed statistically significant differences in the head rotation from each rotational angle (P , .05), whereas the ordinate values were almost the same in all rotational angles regardless of the head rotation. The abscissa values of each landmark anterior to the vertical rotational axis displaced in the same direction as the head rotation, whereas those of other landmarks posterior to the vertical rotational axis displaced in the opposite direction. The mean differences of the abscissa values, per 1 8 of head rotation, were larger as the landmark was located further anteroposteriorly from the vertical rotational axis and smaller as the landmark was located nearer the vertical rotational axis. In view of the projection error, a posteroanterior cephalometric radiograph is a more valuable diagnostic tool when it is exposed with no head rotation about the vertical Z-axis. ( Angle Orthod 2002;72:36-42.)
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes
TL;DR: The proposed hybrid algorithm shows that a fast initial 2‐dimensional landmark search can be useful for a more accurate 3D annotation and could save computational time compared with a full‐volume analysis and shows that full bone structures from CBCT are manageable in a personal computer for 3D modern cephalometry.
65
Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry.
TL;DR: Postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are very reliable and accurate for the detection of asymmetry and should be considered over conventional PA cephalometry when a chin deviation is present.
61
A Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Cephalometric Evaluations of Children with Cleft Lip and Palate
TL;DR: Comparisons of orthodontic measurement performed on cephalometric films and 3D CT images of cleft lip and palate patients indicate significant differences between measurements taken from 2D and 3d images in patients with cleftlip and palate.
Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements.
Diana S. Jodeh,Lauren V. Kuykendall,Jonathan Ford,Stephen Ruso,Summer J. Decker,S. Alex Rottgers +5 more
TL;DR: The differences between angular cephalometric values obtained from 2D LCRs and 3D CT reconstructions are small, and this supports the practices of using 2D and3D cEPhalometric data interchangeably in most applications.
10
References
The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements
TL;DR: The sources of error in cephalometric measurement and their analyses are discussed, and the importance of distinguishing bias and random errors is emphasized, and methods of control are discussed.
1.8K
A NEW X-RAY TECHNIQUE and ITS APPLICATION TO ORTHODONTIA
TL;DR: This paper presents a poster presented at the Mid-Winter Meeting of the Chicago Dental Society, February 4, 1931, presenting a poster entitled “Preparations for the Exhibition of Orthodontia of the United States of America”.
1.1K
The reliability of head film measurements: 1. Landmark identification☆☆☆
TL;DR: Ass assessments have been made of the reliability of identification of sixteen standard head film landmarks in replicated tracings of the same head film, and the impact of the observed errors in landmark location on clinical decisions can be reduced through the routine use of replicated estimates for each landmark.
848
•Book
Bolton standards of dentofacial developmental growth
Birdsall Holly Broadbent,Broadbent,William H. Golden +2 more
- 01 Jan 1975
501
An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex.
Sharad M. Shah,M. R. Joshi +1 more
TL;DR: This poster presents a poster presented at the 2017 International Congress of Orthodontics on Dental Education and Research in Bangkok, Thailand, presenting a poster entitled “Dentistry and the Art of Dentistry: Foundations of Dental Dentistry in the 21st Century”.
266