EAU Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2014 Update
Börje Ljungberg,Karim Bensalah,Steven E. Canfield,Saeed Dabestani,Fabian Hofmann,Milan Hora,Markus A. Kuczyk,Thomas B. Lam,Lorenzo Marconi,Axel S. Merseburger,Peter F.A. Mulders,Thomas Powles,Michael Staehler,Alessandro Volpe,Axel Bex +14 more
TL;DR: The 2014 RCC guideline has been updated by a multidisciplinary panel using the highest methodological standards, and provides the best and most reliable contemporary evidence base for RCC management.
read more
About: This article is published in European Urology. The article was published on 01 Sep 2010. and is currently open access. The article focuses on the topics: Guideline & Systematic review.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Renal cell carcinoma in a semi-urban population of south-western Nigeria
TL;DR: RCC is more common in females mainly of the younger age group in the authors' environment, and radical nephrectomy remains the mainstay of management, including in advanced cases.
Multidisciplinary management of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in Africa and the Middle East: current practice and recommendations for improvement.
Jamal Zekri,Lydia Dreosti,Marwan Ghosn,Emad Hamada,Mohamed Jaloudi,Ola Khorshid,Blaha Larbaoui +6 more
TL;DR: Sustained action will be required to ensure that all patients with RCC in the region benefit from up-to-date care, and establishing combined genitourinary cancer clinics and formal referral systems should encourage a culture of effective communication.
The current status of thermal ablation in the management of T1b renal masses.
TL;DR: Current evidence for cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation of T1b renal masses as well as current AUA and EAU guidelines for thermal ablation are examined.
13
Improving the efficacy of proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma by combination with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-protease inhibitors lopinavir or nelfinavir.
Dominik Abt,Andrej Besse,Lenka Sedlarikova,Marianne Kraus,Juergen Bader,Tobias Silzle,Martina Vodinska,Ondrej Slaby,Hans-Peter Schmid,Daniel S. Engeler,Christoph Driessen,Lenka Besse +11 more
TL;DR: To assess the potential of second‐generation proteasome inhibition by carfilzomib and its combination with the human immunodeficiency virus (Hiv) protease inhibitors (HIV‐PIs) lopinavir and nelfinavir in vitro for improved treatment of clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC).
13
Pretreatment Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Liangyou Gu,Xin Ma,Yongpeng Xie,Hongzhao Li,Lei Wang,Luyao Chen,Wenlei Zhao,Yu Zhang,Xu Zhang +8 more
TL;DR: Pretreatment LMR appears to be an independent prognostic factor of PFS and OS for patients with metastatic ccRCC after surgery, and it can be utilized to enhance the predictive ability of well‐established prognostic models.
13
References
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
•Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
49.6K
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher,A. Liberati,J. Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman +3 more
TL;DR: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are crucial in healthcare, informing clinical practice guidelines and research funding decisions, but their value depends on transparent and clear reporting, highlighting the need for standardized guidelines like the PRISMA statement.
20.1K
TNM classification of malignant tumours
Leslie H. Sobin,Mary Gospodarowicz,Ch. Wittekind +2 more
- 01 Jan 1987
TL;DR: Head and Neck Tumours.- Lip and Oral Cavity.- Pharynx.- Larynx.' Maxillary Sinus.- Salivary Glands.- Thyroid Gland.- Digestive System Tumour .
18.2K