“Doing What Matters in Times of Stress” to Decrease Psychological Distress During COVID-19: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial
1
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examined the effectiveness of a guided self-help intervention "Doing What Matters in Times of Stress" (DWM) in decreasing psychological distress in Turkish and Syrian participants.
read more
Abstract: Despite the increasing psychological distress during COVID-19, utilisation of face-to-face psychological interventions decreased profoundly. The aim of this study involving two parallel, two-armed pilot randomised controlled trials was to examine the effectiveness of a guided self-help intervention “Doing What Matters in Times of Stress” (DWM) in decreasing psychological distress in Turkish and Syrian participants. Seventy-four Turkish nationals and 50 Syrian refugee adults with psychological distress were randomly allocated to a DWM group or wait-list control group. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 postintervention. Secondary outcome measures were the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5, Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II postintervention. Although this study was not powered to detect a significant effect for DWM postassessment between DWM and the control group, results showed a significant improvement in depression symptoms among Turkish participants in the DWM group (d = 0.46) and in PTSD symptoms among Syrian participants in the DWM group (d = 0.67) from pre- to postintervention assessment. These results indicate the potential of DWM to decrease mental health problems during the pandemic and importance of a fully powered, definitive controlled trial to examine its effectiveness both for the host community and refugees to reduce psychological distress during COVID-19.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A low-cost digital first aid tool to reduce psychological distress in refugees: a multi-country randomized controlled trial of Self-Help Online in the first months after the invasion of Ukraine
Anastasiya-Mariya Asanov Noha,Igor Asanov,Guido Buenstorf +2 more
References
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.
TL;DR: In the new version, procedures to analyze the power of tests based on single-sample tetrachoric correlations, comparisons of dependent correlations, bivariate linear regression, multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, logistic regression, and Poisson regression are added.
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
TL;DR: In this article, a 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity, and increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment.
24.8K
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.
Samantha K Brooks,Rebecca K. Webster,Louise E. Smith,Lisa Woodland,Simon Wessely,Neil Greenberg,Gideon James Rubin +6 more
TL;DR: A review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases is presented in this article, where the authors report negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger.
14.5K
Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress.
Ronald C. Kessler,Gavin Andrews,L J Colpe,Eva Hiripi,Daniel K. Mroczek,Sharon-Lise T. Normand,E. E. Walters,Alan M. Zaslavsky +7 more
TL;DR: The brevity, strong psychometric properties, and ability to discriminate DSM-IV cases from non-cases make the K10 and K6 attractive for use in general-purpose health surveys.
9.4K
The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure
Kurt Kroenke,Robert L. Spitzer +1 more
TL;DR: A number of case-finding instruments for detecting depression in primary care, ranging from 2 to 28 items, tend to be highly correlated, with little evidence that one measure is superior to any other.
5.6K