Open Access
Does It Pay Off to Include Non-Internet Households in an Internet Panel?
J. Leenheer,Annette Scherpenzeel +1 more
- 01 Jan 2013
Vol. 8, Iss: 1, pp 17-29
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated whether it is possible to improve the representativeness of an Internet panel by including non-Internet households, i.e., households with no Internet access at the time of sampling, with cost-free equipment and an Internet connection.
read more
Abstract: This paper investigates whether it is possible to improve the representativeness of an Internet panel by including non-Internet households. We study the LISS panel, managed by CentERdata, an Internet panel based on a probability sample that comprises approximately 5000 households. The LISS panel provides non-Internet households, households with no Internet access at the time of the sampling, with cost-free equipment and an Internet connection. Early 2010 the LISS panel contained 545 non-Internet households, this equals approximately 10% of the entire panel. The analyses show that particularly older households, non-western immigrants, and one-person households are less likely to have Internet access. The LISS panel includes a representative sample of non-Internet households except for households with high average age ("the oldest old"). Non-Internet households who participate in the panel show higher response rates on the individual questionnaires and lower attrition rates. While significant differences between the panel and the Dutch population remain, the complete LISS panel, with both Internet and non-Internet households, appears to be closer to the Dutch population than the panel consisting only of Internet households for all socio-demographic variables we tested. Furthermore, about half of the non-Internet households start to use the Internet after they have become panel members. They use less of the options offered by Internet, and mainly use the simpler applications, such as e-mail and information search, compared to persons living in Internet households. In this sense, they remain different from the original Internet households and continue to contribute to the quality of the panel data.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Is the European Health Interview Survey online yet? Response and net sample composition of a web-based data collection.
Elise Braekman,Rana Charafeddine,Stefaan Demarest,Sabine Drieskens,Jean Tafforeau,Johan Van der Heyden,Guido Van Hal +6 more
TL;DR: The response rate was lower than those of MS using mixed-mode designs including web, especially these comprising interviewer-based approaches, and efforts to increase the response should be further explored.
11
Implementing a Multinational Study of Questionnaire Design
Henning Silber,Tobias Stark,Annelies G. Blom,Jon A. Krosnick +3 more
- 28 Sep 2018
TL;DR: In recent years, in order to provide higher sample quality in online data collections, there has been a rise in online panels based on probability samples that aim to be representative of the general population.
8
Workshop Synthesis: Conducting Travel Surveys using Portable Devices - Role of Technology in Travel Surveys
TL;DR: Discussion of the role of technologies such as GPS, smartphones and life-logging cameras in travel surveys, post-processing of location and time data collected by those technologies, their usability, and future opportunities and challenges are synthesized.
8
Survey Methods, Online
Catherine M. Hooker,Homero Gil de Zúñiga +1 more
- 07 Nov 2017
TL;DR: Although there are several data collection modes in which surveys can be conducted, including snail mail, face-to-face, and over the telephone, in 2009, 85% of all online survey research conducted replaced traditional data collection means.
7
References
Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches.
TL;DR: By offering a typology of Web survey designs, the intent of this article is to facilitate the task of evaluating and improving Web surveys.
2.3K
Model of adoption and technology in households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle
TL;DR: The first quantitative test of the recently developed model of adoption of technology in households (MATH) showed that the integrated model, including MATH constructs and life cycle characteristics, explained 74 percent of the variance in intention to adopt a PC for home use.
1.5K
Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet
Don A. Dillman,Glenn Phelps,Robert Tortora,Karen Swift,Julie Kohrell,Jodi Berck,Benjamin L. Messer +6 more
TL;DR: Responses to the aural modes (telephone and IVR) are significantly more likely than are respondents to the visual modes (mail and web) to give extreme positive responses, a difference that cannot be accounted for by a tendency towards recency effects with telephone.
981
Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels
Mario Callegaro,Charles DiSogra +1 more
TL;DR: The sparse literature on how to compute response, refusal, and other rates is discussed and a set of formulas and a standardized terminology that can be used to calculate and interpret these metrics for online panel studies are proposed.
539
Determination of Adopter Categories by Using Innovation Diffusion Models
TL;DR: Using the analytical logic underlying the classical adopter categorization approach proposed by Rogers, the authors suggest that adopter categories for a product innovation can also be developed by product innovation start-up companies.
457