Journal Article10.1111/J.1540-6261.1985.TB02363.X
Dividends, Dilution, and Taxes: A Signalling Equilibrium
Kose John,Joseph Williams +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a signalling equilibrium with taxable dividends is identified, where corporate insiders with more valuable private information optimally distribute larger dividends and receive higher prices for their stock whenever the demand for cash by both their firm and its current stockholders exceeds its internal supply of cash.
read more
Abstract: A signalling equilibrium with taxable dividends is identified. In this equilibrium, corporate insiders with more valuable private information optimally distribute larger dividends and receive higher prices for their stock whenever the demand for cash by both their firm and its current stockholders exceeds its internal supply of cash. In equilibrium, many firms distribute dividends and simultaneously issue new stock, while other firms pay no dividends. Because dividends reveal all private information not conveyed by corporate audits, current stockholders capture in equilibrium all economic rents net of dissipative signalling costs. Both the announcement effect and the relationship between dividends and cum-dividend market values are derived explicitly. DIVIDENDS HAVE LONG PERPLEXED financial economists. Despite recent successes in constructing signalling equilibria with dividends, many important questions remain unanswered.' For example, why do corporations declare dividends and simultaneously sell new stock or, alternatively, distribute dividends and not repurchase stock? How do dividends with their dissipative costsprimarily adverse personal taxes-coexist with other presumably less costly technologies for releasing inside information, like audited annual reports? Do plausible signalling equilibria with dividends require transaction costs incurred by either corporations when issuing or retiring stock or investors when trading outstanding shares? Finally, how do the tax rates and demands for liquidity of such investors as widows, senior citizens, and financial institutions influence signalling equilibria? A satisfactory theory of signalling with dividends must also have empirical content. In particular, such a theory should provide empirically testable propositions detailing the effects of announced dividends on stock prices,2 crosssectional connections between dividends and market values, and any resulting relationships between payout ratios and rates of return on stocks.3 In addition,
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A Catering Theory of Dividends
Malcolm Baker,Jeffrey Wurgler +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the decision to pay dividends is driven by prevailing investor demand for dividend payers and that managers cater to investors by paying dividends when investors put a stock price premium on payers, and by not paying when investors prefer nonpayers.
Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm's Financial Policy
Stephen Bond,Costas Meghir +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the sensitivity of investment to the availability of internal funds using the hierarchy of finance approach to corporate finance is investigated using U.K. company panel data to estimate dynamic investment models using GMM.
1.1K
Do Changes in Dividends Signal the Future or the Past
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the idea that changes in dividends have information content about the future earnings of the firm and find only limited support for it and conclude that the size of the dividend increase does not predict future earnings.
1.1K
Payout Policy in the 21st Century
TL;DR: The authors survey 384 financial executives and conduct in depth interviews with an additional 23 to determine the factors that drive dividend and share repurchase decisions, finding that maintaining the dividend level is on par with investment decisions, while repurchases are made out of the residual cash flow after investment spending.
1K
•Posted Content
Do Taxes Affect Corporate Financing Decisions
TL;DR: The authors found that non-debt tax shields "crowd out" interest deductibility, thus decreasing the desirability of debt issues at the margin, and showed the importance of controlling for confounding effects which other papers ignored.
1K
References
Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of differences in dividend policy on the current price of shares in an ideal economy characterized by perfect capital markets, rational behavior, and perfect certainty is examined.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Simon Kuznets
- 13 Aug 2024
Abstract: I. Formulation of the question. A brief historical survey, 381. — II. Recent discussion in Germany: Lederer, Loewe, Carrel, 386. — III. In what sense the equilibrium theory is valid, 392. — IV. The clement of time differences: Rosenstein-Rodan, further elaboration, 401. — V. Time differences and the cumulation of random changes, 408. — VI. Summary, 412.
6.5K
The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the process by which common stock prices adjust to the information (if any) that is implicit in a stock split and show that the independence of successive price changes is consistent with a market that adjusts rapidly to new information.
The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that if managers possess inside information about the activities of firms, then the choice of a managerial incentive schedule and of a financial structure signals information to the market, and in competitive equilibrium the inferences drawn from the signals will be validated.
Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information
Merton H. Miller,Kevin Rock +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors extend the standard finance model of the firm's dividend/investment/financing decisions by allowing the managers to know more than outside investors about the true state of the current earnings.