Diversifying Collaborative Filtering via Graph Spreading Network and Selective Sampling

TL;DR: In this paper , a graph spreading network (GSN) is proposed to address the accuracy-diversity dilemma of CF. But, it suffers from the difficulty of adapting to different scenarios' demands concerning the accuracydiversity ratio of their recommendation lists.

Abstract: Graph neural network (GNN) is a robust model for processing non-Euclidean data, such as graphs, by extracting structural information and learning high-level representations. GNN has achieved state-of-the-art recommendation performance on collaborative filtering (CF) for accuracy. Nevertheless, the diversity of the recommendations has not received good attention. Existing work using GNN for recommendation suffers from the accuracy-diversity dilemma, where slightly increases diversity while accuracy drops significantly. Furthermore, GNN-based recommendation models lack the flexibility to adapt to different scenarios’ demands concerning the accuracy-diversity ratio of their recommendation lists. In this work, we endeavor to address the above problems from the perspective of aggregate diversity, which modifies the propagation rule and develops a new sampling strategy. We propose graph spreading network (GSN), a novel model that leverages only neighborhood aggregation for CF. Specifically, GSN learns user and item embeddings by propagating them over the graph structure, utilizing both diversity-oriented and accuracy-oriented aggregations. The final representations are obtained by taking the weighted sum of the embeddings learned at all layers. We also present a new sampling strategy that selects potentially accurate and diverse items as negative samples to assist model training. GSN effectively addresses the accuracy-diversity dilemma and achieves improved diversity while maintaining accuracy with the help of a selective sampler. Moreover, a hyper-parameter in GSN allows for adjustment of the accuracy-diversity ratio of recommendation lists to satisfy the diverse demands. Compared to the state-of-the-art model, GSN improved <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R$</tex-math> </inline-formula> @20 by <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1.62\%$</tex-math> </inline-formula> , <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$</tex-math> </inline-formula> @20 by <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.67\%$</tex-math> </inline-formula> , <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$G$</tex-math> </inline-formula> @20 by <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3.59\%$</tex-math> </inline-formula> , and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$E$</tex-math> </inline-formula> @20 by <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4.15\%$</tex-math> </inline-formula> on average over three real-world datasets, verifying the effectiveness of our proposed model in diversifying overall collaborative recommendations.