Disentangling workplace innovation: a systematic literature review

Question

1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Disentangling workplace innovation: a systematic literature review" ?

2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "Disentangling workplace innovation: a systematic literature review" ?

3. What are some of the perspectives that have generally (but not exclusively) informed research activity on WI?

4. What was the effect of employee participation in the decision-making process?

Accepted Answer

The purpose of this paper is to consolidate the state of extant academic research on workplace innovation ( WI ) by proposing a comprehensive conceptual framework and outlining research traditions on the phenomenon.. This paper systematically reviewed the literature published over the past 20 years, basing on a predefined research protocol.. The dimensions of WI were explored with the help of thematic synthesis, while the research perspectives were studied by means of textual narrative synthesis.. The paper includes implications for developing and implementing WI programs.. Originality/value – This paper for the first time systematically reviews literature on the topic of WI, clarifies the concept and discusses directions and implications for the future research.. The analysis suggests that there exist four research traditions on WI – built container, humanized landscape, socio-material macro-actor, and polyadic network – and each of them comprises its own set of assumptions, foci of study, and ontological bases.. The findings suggest that WI is a heterogeneous process of renovation occurring in eight different dimensions, namely work system, workplace democracy, high-tech application, workplace boundaries, workspaces, people practices, workplace experience, and workplace culture.

Accepted Answer

However, their goal was not to provide solutions as how best to study WIs ; rather, their goal was to explore many ontological, epistemological and theoretical issues regarding the topic.. There are many opportunities enclosed in this renovation process and the authors hope their paper will generate interest and alternative perspectives on addressing WIs in future studies.

Accepted Answer

Among theoretical perspectives that have generally (but not exclusively) informed research activity on WI: contingency theory, flexible accumulation theory, resource-based view, action-regulation theory, socio-technical systems, institutional theory, theory of social transformation, and dynamic capabilities.

Accepted Answer

The employee participation in the decision-making process had the spillover effect and resulted in general democratization of workplaces.

Accepted Answer

With the advent of new work systems, the relatively stable boundaries of hegemonic organizational culture weakened and a new post-modern paradigm arose: it celebrated difference and ephemerality.

Accepted Answer

The reliability of their study is assured by the degree of methodological transparency, protocol development, and reliability of selection principles.

Accepted Answer

It was guaranteed by cooperative forms (e.g. trade unions, collective bargaining), and the main mechanisms for requiring democracy existed outside the workplace.

Accepted Answer

The non-uniformity in the use of the terminology on WI, as well as the absence of theoretical framework, were a serious impediment for the systematic review.

Accepted Answer

Other fields interested in the topic are: sociology (n¼ 15), architecture, design, ergonomics (n¼ 12), science and technology (n¼ 8), and organizational psychology (n¼ 5).

Accepted Answer

Workspace became an important vehicle of organizational culture and a well-being promotion tool (e.g. active design, green building, standing desks, leisure spaces, etc.).

Accepted Answer

Their study outlined eight WI dimensions, namely work system (n¼ 64), workplace democracy (n¼ 15), high-tech application (n¼ 23), workplace boundaries (n¼ 6), workspaces (n¼ 17), people practices (n¼ 29), workplace experience (n¼ 25), and workplace culture (n¼ 12).

Accepted Answer

The first step was the consideration of fundamental values of democracy in different spheres of organizational life: work processes, division of work, organizational structures, political representation, etc.

Accepted Answer

One of the possibilities is to account for larger networks (e.g. ecosystems, platforms, communities of practice, foundations, consortia), or to use some available tools for alternative boundaries definition, such as Ulrich’s critical systems heuristics (Ulrich and Reynolds, 2010) and boundary critique (Midgley et al., 1998).

Accepted Answer

The research protocol comprised several sections: inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevance and quality criteria, guidelines for thematic and narrative synthesis, quality criteria of the review synthesis (see Tables AI and AII).

Accepted Answer

The emerging landscape (or “workscape”) of work is that of distributed virtually connected workspaces that match the fluid and dynamic nature of networked knowledge work (Harrison et al., 2003).

Accepted Answer

Greater participation and equality status resulted in programs of profit and gains sharing, promoting thus the idea of collective ownership.

Accepted Answer

The interactive nature of service work, its unpredictable and customer-driven workflows, and the process of “co-production”with customers required new forms of work organization for ensuring service quality (Hunter, 2000).

Accepted Answer

The databases/search engines were mined for citations from 1995 to present, with filters used according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Accepted Answer

For instance, a series of people practices have been reshaped on the basis of gamification idea (Oprescu et al., 2014), e.g., game-based recruitment and selection, serious training games, etc.

Disentangling workplace innovation: a systematic literature review

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper

Most frequently asked questions

1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Disentangling workplace innovation: a systematic literature review" ?

2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "Disentangling workplace innovation: a systematic literature review" ?

3. What are some of the perspectives that have generally (but not exclusively) informed research activity on WI?

4. What was the effect of employee participation in the decision-making process?

5. What was the effect of the advent of new work systems?

6. What are the main criteria for ensuring the reliability of their study?

7. What were the main mechanisms for requiring democracy outside the workplace?

8. What were the main obstacles to the systematic review?

9. What are the other fields interested in the topic?

10. What is the role of workspace in the workplace?

11. What are the dimensions of WI that were explored in the academic literature?

12. What was the first step in the development of the post-modern workplace democracy?

13. What is the way to account for larger networks?

14. What were the main sections of the research protocol?

15. What is the definition of a networked work environment?

16. What was the effect of greater participation and equality status on the idea of collective ownership?

17. What was the role of the interactive nature of service work in the post-modern world?

18. What criteria were used to determine the number of citations?

19. What are some examples of how people practices have been reshaped?

Figures

Citations

The process of reinventing a job: A meta–synthesis of qualitative job crafting research

Materiality and Space: Organizations, Artefacts and Practices

The ontology of innovation: human agency in the pursuit of novelty [Earlier version of this paper was presented at the History of Economic Thought Society of Australia Conference (2006: Ballarat). Paper in: Festschrift for Allen Oakley. O'Hara, Phillip Anthony (ed).]

Who is lean & mean? /

Measuring workplace innovation: Scale development

References

Nice Work? Rethinking Managerial Control in an Era of Knowledge Work:

A companion to social archaeology

Participatory methods effective for ergonomic workplace improvement.

Seeking a facilities management philosophy for the changing workplace

Toward a Model of Work Redesign for Better Work and Better Life

Related Papers (5)

What is practical knowledge

The innovative workplace: an analytical model focusing on the relationship between spatial and organisational issues

Implementation of E-learning in a Large Organization: The Critical Role of Relevance to Work

The Open Innovation Research Landscape: Established Perspectives and Emerging Themes across Different Levels of Analysis

Accessing ideas to develop leadership and organization