Discourse and Social Psychology

TL;DR: This study protocol describes a co-operative inquiry designed to collaboratively explore the needs for psychosocial support for people bereaved by suicide late in life and to use ‘action circles’ to develop and test psychossocial interventions.

TL;DR: In this paper, a multi-level focus on the meaning-making practices of policy actors at the European Commission and in the Netherlands is presented, which reveals a European legal discourse legitimated by expert authorization which differs with a Dutch national discourse legitimate by mythopoesis.

TL;DR: The presente tesis doctoral is un estudio de caso, etnografico, and cualitativo of tres profesores that fueron observados in un contexto institucional que es el Centro de Ensenanza de Lenguas Extranjeras (CELE) of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) as mentioned in this paper.

TL;DR: In this article, it is argued that deviance should be analyzed as a relative phenomenon in different and changing cultures, vis-a-vis change and stability in the boundaries of diverse symbolic-moral universes.

TL;DR: In this article, an analysis of theory and research in social psychology reveals that while methods of research are scientific in character, theories of social behavior are primarily reflections of contemporary history, and the dissemination of psychological knowledge modifies the patterns of behavior upon which the knowledge is based.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors set the concern with intersubjectivity in theoretical context, sketches the organization by which it is grounded and defended in ordinary interaction, describes the practices by which trouble in understanding is dealt with, and illustrates what happens when this organization fails to function.

TL;DR: This article examined the connections between grammar and social organization via one of the most pervasive practices of speaking used in talk-in-interaction: yes/no type interrogatives and the turns speakers build in response to them.

TL;DR: The authors distinguishes a series of contingent and necessary problems that arise in the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of open-ended or conversational qualitative interviews in psychological research, including the deletion of the interviewer, the conventions for representing interaction, the specificity of analytic observations, the unavailability of the interview set-up and the failure to consider interviews as interaction.