Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for polyp detection: systematic review and meta-analyses
Tue Kjølhede,Anne Mette Ølholm,Lasse Kaalby,Lasse Kaalby,Kristian Kidholm,Niels Qvist,Gunnar Baatrup,Gunnar Baatrup +7 more
TL;DR: CCE has a high sensitivity and specificity for per-patient polyps compared to SC, however, the relatively high rate of incomplete investigations limits the application of CCE in a CRC-screening setting.
read more
Abstract: Background Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a technology that might contribute to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs as a filter test between fecal immunochemical testing and standard colonoscopy. The aim was to systematically review the literature for studies investigating the diagnostic yield of second-generation CCE compared with standard colonoscopy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Study characteristics including quality of bowel preparation and completeness of CCE transits were extracted. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity were extracted for polyps (any size, ≥ 10 mm, ≥ 6 mm) and lesion characteristics. Meta-analyses of diagnostic yield were performed. Results The literature search revealed 1077 unique papers and 12 studies were included. Studies involved a total of 2199 patients, of whom 1898 were included in analyses. The rate of patients with adequate bowel preparation varied from 40 % to 100 %. The rates of complete CCE transit varied from 57 % to 100 %. Our meta-analyses demonstrated that mean (95 % confidence interval) sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were: 0.85 (0.73–0.92), 0.85 (0.70–0.93), and 30.5 (16.2–57.2), respectively, for polyps of any size; 0.87 (0.82–0.90), 0.95 (0.92–0.97), and 136.0 (70.6–262.1), respectively, for polyps ≥ 10 mm; and 0.87 (0.83–0.90), 0.88 (0.75–0.95), and 51.1 (19.8–131.8), respectively, for polyps ≥ 6 mm. No serious adverse events were reported for CCE. Conclusion CCE had high sensitivity and specificity for per-patient polyps compared with standard colonoscopy However, the relatively high rate of incomplete investigations limits the application of CCE in a CRC screening setting.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Fully automated magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy for examination of the stomach and small bowel: a prospective, feasibility, two-centre study.
Yu-Feng Xiao,Zhi-Xuan Wu,Song He,Yuanyuan Zhou,Yong-Bing Zhao,Jialin He,Xue Peng,Zhao-Xia Yang,Qing-Jian Lv,Huan Yang,Jian-Ying Bai,Chaoqiang Fan,Bo Tang,Chang-Jiang Hu,Meng-Meng Jie,En Liu,Hui Lin,Anastasios Koulaouzidis,Xiao-Yan Zhao,Shi-Ming Yang,Xia Xie +20 more
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of a fully automated magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (FAMCE) system in clinical practice for gastroscopy and small bowel examination.
33
ScotCap – A large observational cohort study
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors evaluated the performance of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) in a lower gastrointestinal diagnostic care pathway and found that CCE is a safe, well-tolerated diagnostic test which can reduce the proportion of patients requiring colonoscopy, but the test completion rate needs to be improved.
Efficacy of bowel preparation regimens for colon capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Thomas Bjoersum-Meyer,Karolina Skonieczna-Zydecka,Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia,Iréne Stenfors,Ivan Lyutakov,Emanuele Rondonotti,Marco Pennazio,Wojciech Marlicz,Gunnar Baatrup,Anastasios Koulaouzidis,Ervin Toth +10 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of different bowel preparations regimens on CR and ACR in colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) in specific clinical settings.
Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy—A Systematic Review
TL;DR: The use of artificial intelligence for reviewing second-generation colon capsule endoscopy images is promising, but convolutional neural network algorithms should be optimized and tested with more data, possibly requiring the set-up of a large international colon capsuleendoscopy database.
Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: Interim analyses of randomized controlled trial CareForColon2015.
Ulrik Deding,Ulrik Deding,Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer,Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer,Lasse Kaalby,Lasse Kaalby,Morten Kobaek-Larsen,Morten Kobaek-Larsen,Marianne Kirstine Thygesen,Marianne Kirstine Thygesen,Jeppe Buur Madsen,Rasmus Kroijer,Gunnar Baatrup,Gunnar Baatrup +13 more
TL;DR: The Danish CareForColon2015 trial as discussed by the authors is the largest randomized controlled trial to date on colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), which evaluated the initial 234 CCEs according to quality, safety, and completion.
References
Colon capsule endoscopy: detection of colonic polyps compared with conventional colonoscopy and visualization of extracolonic pathologies.
Alexander F. Hagel,Erwin Gäbele,Martin Raithel,WH Hagel,Heinz Albrecht,Thomas M. de Rossi,Christine Singer,Thomas Schneider,Markus F. Neurath,MJ Farnbacher +9 more
TL;DR: CCE proved to be technically feasible and safe and new indications for the PillCam Colon 2 may be defined because extracolonic pathologies were effectively visualized.
Multicenter feasibility study of bowel preparation with castor oil for colon capsule endoscopy.
Naoki Ohmiya,Naoki Hotta,Shoji Mitsufuji,Masanao Nakamura,Takafumi Omori,Kohei Maeda,Kotaro Okuda,Hiroshi Yatsuya,Hisao Tajiri +8 more
TL;DR: The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of castor oil as a booster in patients undergoing colon capsule endoscopy.
29
Colonoscopy-related complications in a nationwide immunochemical fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening program
Ellen M. Mikkelsen,Mette Kielsholm Thomsen,Julie Tybjerg,Lennart Friis-Hansen,Berit Andersen,Jens Christian Riis Jørgensen,Gunnar Baatrup,Gunnar Baatrup,Sisse Helle Njor,Frank Mehnert,Morten Rasmussen +10 more
TL;DR: The Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database (DCCSD) has low sensitivity for complications, and improvements in data registration are warranted.
Colon capsule endoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in those with family histories of colorectal cancer.
Andrea Parodi,Geoffroy Vanbiervliet,Cesare Hassan,Xavier Hébuterne,Antonella De Ceglie,Rosa Filiberti,Cristano Spada,Massimo Conio +7 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was evaluated in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer patients.
22
Evaluation for the Clinical Efficacy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Detection of Laterally Spreading Tumors
TL;DR: The sensitivity for detecting LSTs is lower with CCE2 than it is with OC, especially for L STs located on the right colon or for SSA/P.
18