Journal Article10.1542/PEDS.2009-3146
Development and Validity of a 2-Item Screen to Identify Families at Risk for Food Insecurity
Erin R. Hager,Anna M. Quigg,Anna M. Quigg,Maureen M. Black,Sharon M. Coleman,Timothy Heeren,Ruth Rose-Jacobs,John T. Cook,Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba,Patrick H. Casey,Mariana Chilton,Diana B. Cutts,Alan Meyers,Deborah A. Frank +13 more
TL;DR: A 2-item FI screen was sensitive, specific, and valid among low-income families with young children, enabling providers to target services that ameliorate the health and developmental consequences associated with FI.
read more
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop a brief screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity (FI) and to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and convergent validity of the screen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Caregivers of children (age: birth through 3 years) from 7 urban medical centers completed the US Department of Agriculture 18-item Household Food Security Survey (HFSS), reports of child health, hospitalizations in their lifetime, and developmental risk. Children were weighed and measured. An FI screen was developed on the basis of affirmative HFSS responses among food-insecure families. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. Convergent validity (the correspondence between the FI screen and theoretically related variables) was assessed with logistic regression, adjusted for covariates including study site; the caregivers9 race/ethnicity, US-born versus immigrant status, marital status, education, and employment; history of breastfeeding; child9s gender; and the child9s low birth weight status. RESULTS: The sample included 30 098 families, 23% of which were food insecure. HFSS questions 1 and 2 were most frequently endorsed among food-insecure families (92.5% and 81.9%, respectively). An affirmative response to either question 1 or 2 had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 83% and was associated with increased risk of reported poor/fair child health (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.56; P CONCLUSIONS: A 2-item FI screen was sensitive, specific, and valid among low-income families with young children. The FI screen rapidly identifies households at risk for FI, enabling providers to target services that ameliorate the health and developmental consequences associated with FI.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
NPCC4: Climate change, energy, and energy insecurity in New York City
Liv Yoon,Jennifer Ventrella,Peter J. Marcotullio,Tom Matte,Kathryn Lane,John M Tipaldo,Sonal Jessel,K.W. Schmid,J.M. Casagrande,Hayley Elszasz +9 more
TL;DR: Energy trends in New York City and State, with implications for human health and wellbeing, focusing on energy insecurity.
5
Food as Medicine Clinic: Early Results and Lessons Learned
David Hu,Anna Cherian,Kevin Chagin,Jennifer Bier,Douglas Einstadter,Douglas D. Gunzler,Alissa Glenn,Eleanor Mclaughlin,Karen J. Cook,James E Misak,Shari Bolen +10 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the effect of a hospital-based food pantry clinic on self-reported dietary changes, health outcomes, and resource utilization was examined, and a weak association between FAM clinic visit frequency and changes in dietary behaviors was found.
Barbershop-Facilitated Community-to-Clinic Linkage Implementation Program: Rationale and Protocol for a Novel Program to Prevent Hypertension Among Black Men.
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors describe the rationale and study protocol for the development and testing of a barbershop facilitation (BF) strategy, with trained Community Health Workers, to implement and scale CLIP for HTN prevention in Black men.
5
Screening for household food insecurity in primary care settings: a commentary.
TL;DR: Screening for household FI on the basis of underweight, overweight and poor weight gain is not an effective way of identifying FI households.
5
A Small-Changes Weight Loss Programfor African-American Church Members.
Melissa M. Crane,Joselyn L. Williams,Chasidy K Garcia,Kandice Jones,Inita N Callaway,Christy C. Tangney,Laura J. Zimmermann,Elizabeth B. Lynch +7 more
TL;DR: This study suggests that a faith-based, faith-placed intervention utilizing a small-changes approach in African American churches may achieve sustained weight loss in parishioners with obesity.
5
References
2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.
Robert J. Kuczmarski,Cynthia L. Ogden,Shumei S. Guo,Laurence M. Grummer-Strawn,Katherine M. Flegal,Zuguo Mei,Rong Wei,Lester R. Curtin,Alex F. Roche,Clifford L. Johnson +9 more
- 01 May 2002
TL;DR: The 2000 CDC growth charts were developed with improved data and statistical procedures and now have an instrument for growth screening that better represents the racial-ethnic diversity and combination of breast- and formula-feeding in the United States.
6.7K
•Journal Article
CDC growth charts; United States
Robert J. Kuczmarski,Cynthia L. Ogden,Laurence M. Grummer-Strawn,Katherine M. Flegal,Shumei S. Guo,Rong Wei,Zuguo Mei,Lester R. Curtin,Alex F. Roche,Clifford L. Johnson +9 more
TL;DR: Created with improved data and statistical curve smoothing procedures, the United States growth charts represent an enhanced instrument to evaluate the size and growth of infants and children.
The effectiveness of a short form of the Household Food Security Scale.
TL;DR: The short form of the Household Food Security Scale is a brief but potentially useful tool for national surveys and some state/local applications.
911
Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children
Adrian D. Sandler,D. Brazdziunas,W. Carl Cooley,Lilliam Gonzalez De Pijem,D. Hirsch,Theodore A. Kastner,M. E. Kummer,R. D. Quint,E. S. Ruppert,W. C. Anderson,Bev Crider,P. Burgan,C. Garner,Merle McPherson,L. Michaud,Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp,J. Daniel Cartwright,Chris Plauché Johnson,Karen S. Smith +18 more
TL;DR: Recommendations for screening infants and young children and intervening with families to identify developmental delays and disabilities are provided.
561