Journal Article10.1542/PEDS.2009-3146
Development and Validity of a 2-Item Screen to Identify Families at Risk for Food Insecurity
Erin R. Hager,Anna M. Quigg,Anna M. Quigg,Maureen M. Black,Sharon M. Coleman,Timothy Heeren,Ruth Rose-Jacobs,John T. Cook,Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba,Patrick H. Casey,Mariana Chilton,Diana B. Cutts,Alan Meyers,Deborah A. Frank +13 more
TL;DR: A 2-item FI screen was sensitive, specific, and valid among low-income families with young children, enabling providers to target services that ameliorate the health and developmental consequences associated with FI.
read more
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop a brief screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity (FI) and to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and convergent validity of the screen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Caregivers of children (age: birth through 3 years) from 7 urban medical centers completed the US Department of Agriculture 18-item Household Food Security Survey (HFSS), reports of child health, hospitalizations in their lifetime, and developmental risk. Children were weighed and measured. An FI screen was developed on the basis of affirmative HFSS responses among food-insecure families. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. Convergent validity (the correspondence between the FI screen and theoretically related variables) was assessed with logistic regression, adjusted for covariates including study site; the caregivers9 race/ethnicity, US-born versus immigrant status, marital status, education, and employment; history of breastfeeding; child9s gender; and the child9s low birth weight status. RESULTS: The sample included 30 098 families, 23% of which were food insecure. HFSS questions 1 and 2 were most frequently endorsed among food-insecure families (92.5% and 81.9%, respectively). An affirmative response to either question 1 or 2 had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 83% and was associated with increased risk of reported poor/fair child health (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.56; P CONCLUSIONS: A 2-item FI screen was sensitive, specific, and valid among low-income families with young children. The FI screen rapidly identifies households at risk for FI, enabling providers to target services that ameliorate the health and developmental consequences associated with FI.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The Family Home Environment, Food Insecurity, and Body Mass Index in Rural Children.
Jennifer A. Jackson,Ellen Smit,Adam J. Branscum,Katherine B. Gunter,Marie Harvey,Melinda M. Manore,Deborah H. John +6 more
TL;DR: Results suggest that favorable FNPA factors were associated with healthier BMI and lower odds of FI, and opportunities for healthy eating at home may support rural children’s weight health.
24
Correlates of Healthy Eating in Urban Food Desert Communities
TL;DR: These findings confirmed the importance of perceived nutrition environments and household food challenges in predicting dietary outcomes among residents of two urban, low-income, and minority food desert communities.
Longitudinal Patterns of Material Hardship Among US Families
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examined five material hardship types (food, housing, medical, utility, and bill-paying) experienced at five timepoints over 15 years and identified six longitudinal patterns of material hardship experience, characterized by trajectories of stability or movement.
Pregnant women in treatment for opioid use disorder: Material hardships and psychosocial factors.
Ruth Rose-Jacobs,Michelle Trevino-Talbot,Martha Vibbert,Christine Lloyd-Travaglini,Howard Cabral +4 more
TL;DR: Even in women receiving prenatal care and treatment for OUD, food/housing material hardships and associated psychosocial factors are of major concern, requiring screening and remediation.
24
Screening Discordance and Characteristics of Patients With Housing-Related Social Risks.
Emilia H De Marchis,Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba,Lawrence Chang,Richard Sheward,Kelly M. Doran,Laura M. Gottlieb,Alicia J. Cohen,Eric W. Fleegler,Megan Sandel +8 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated discordance among five housing-related screening questions used in health care, and found that 32.8% (n=274) screened discordant, while 21.0% were positive by the Accountable Health Communities tool but negative by Children's HealthWatch.
24
References
2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.
Robert J. Kuczmarski,Cynthia L. Ogden,Shumei S. Guo,Laurence M. Grummer-Strawn,Katherine M. Flegal,Zuguo Mei,Rong Wei,Lester R. Curtin,Alex F. Roche,Clifford L. Johnson +9 more
- 01 May 2002
TL;DR: The 2000 CDC growth charts were developed with improved data and statistical procedures and now have an instrument for growth screening that better represents the racial-ethnic diversity and combination of breast- and formula-feeding in the United States.
6.7K
•Journal Article
CDC growth charts; United States
Robert J. Kuczmarski,Cynthia L. Ogden,Laurence M. Grummer-Strawn,Katherine M. Flegal,Shumei S. Guo,Rong Wei,Zuguo Mei,Lester R. Curtin,Alex F. Roche,Clifford L. Johnson +9 more
TL;DR: Created with improved data and statistical curve smoothing procedures, the United States growth charts represent an enhanced instrument to evaluate the size and growth of infants and children.
The effectiveness of a short form of the Household Food Security Scale.
TL;DR: The short form of the Household Food Security Scale is a brief but potentially useful tool for national surveys and some state/local applications.
911
Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children
Adrian D. Sandler,D. Brazdziunas,W. Carl Cooley,Lilliam Gonzalez De Pijem,D. Hirsch,Theodore A. Kastner,M. E. Kummer,R. D. Quint,E. S. Ruppert,W. C. Anderson,Bev Crider,P. Burgan,C. Garner,Merle McPherson,L. Michaud,Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp,J. Daniel Cartwright,Chris Plauché Johnson,Karen S. Smith +18 more
TL;DR: Recommendations for screening infants and young children and intervening with families to identify developmental delays and disabilities are provided.
561