Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions
TL;DR: The explicit use of theory offers potential advantages in terms of facilitating a better understanding of the generalisability and replicability of implementation interventions, however, this is a relatively unexplored methodological area.
read more
Abstract: Clinical and health services research is continually producing new findings that may contribute to effective and efficient patient care. However, the transfer of research findings into practice is unpredictable and can be a slow and haphazard process. Ideally, the choice of implementation strategies would be based upon evidence from randomised controlled trials or systematic reviews of a given implementation strategy. Unfortunately, reviews of implementation strategies consistently report effectiveness some, but not all of the time; possible causes of this variation are seldom reported or measured by the investigators in the original studies. Thus, any attempts to extrapolate from study settings to the real world are hampered by a lack of understanding of the effects of key elements of individuals, interventions, and the settings in which they were trialled. The explicit use of theory offers a way of addressing these issues and has a number of advantages, such as providing: a generalisable framework within which to represent the dimensions that implementation studies address, a process by which to inform the development and delivery of interventions, a guide when evaluating, and a way to allow for an exploration of potential causal mechanisms. However, the use of theory in designing implementation interventions is methodologically challenging for a number of reasons, including choosing between theories and faithfully translating theoretical constructs into interventions. The explicit use of theory offers potential advantages in terms of facilitating a better understanding of the generalisability and replicability of implementation interventions. However, this is a relatively unexplored methodological area.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
TL;DR: A taxonomy that distinguishes between different categories of theories, models and frameworks in implementation science is proposed to facilitate appropriate selection and application of relevant approaches in implementation research and practice and to foster cross-disciplinary dialogue among implementation researchers.
Can Treatment Adherence Be Improved by Using Rubin's Four Tendencies Framework to Understand a Patient's Response to Expectations
Jeremy Kirk,Anita MacDonald,Paul Lavender,Jessica Dean,Gretchen Rubin +4 more
- 01 May 2017
TL;DR: Rubin's Four Tendencies model provides an opportunity to test a targeted, patient-specific strategy that will provide the most benefit to individual patients and which is easy and inexpensive to administer in everyday practice and widely applicable.
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems
Lou Atkins,Jill J Francis,Jill J Francis,Rafat Islam,Denise O'Connor,Andrea M. Patey,Noah Ivers,Robbie Foy,Eilidh Duncan,Heather Colquhoun,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Rebecca Lawton,Susan Michie +13 more
TL;DR: This guide offers practical guidance for those who wish to apply the Theoretical Domains Framework to assess implementation problems and support intervention design, and provides a brief rationale for using a theoretical approach to investigate and address implementation problems.
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework
TL;DR: A theoretical framework of acceptability consists of seven component constructs: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy that can inform assessment tools and evaluations of the acceptability of new or existing interventions.
The case study approach
TL;DR: Based on the experiences of conducting several health-related case studies, a reflect on the different types of case study design, the specific research questions this approach can help answer, the data sources that tend to be used, and the particular advantages and disadvantages of employing this methodological approach.
2.4K
References
The theory of planned behavior
TL;DR: Ajzen, 1985, 1987, this article reviewed the theory of planned behavior and some unresolved issues and concluded that the theory is well supported by empirical evidence and that intention to perform behaviors of different kinds can be predicted with high accuracy from attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control; and these intentions, together with perceptions of behavioral control, account for considerable variance in actual behavior.
78.4K
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review.
TL;DR: A quantitative integration and review of research on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the subjective norm, which found that intentions and self-predictions were better predictors of behaviour than attitude, subjective norm and PBC.
‘Small Changes’ to Diet and Physical Activity Behaviors for Weight Management
TL;DR: In this article, a case for the use of small and incremental changes in diet and physical activity for improved weight management in the context of a toxic obesogenic environment is presented.
9K
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
Mark Conner,Brian McMillan +1 more
- 01 Jan 2004
TL;DR: The theory of Planned Behaviour is one of the models most frequently used in the literature to explore pro-environmental behaviour including recycling, travel mode choice, energy consumption, water conservation, food choice, and ethical investment.
7K
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Noah Ivers,Gro Jamtvedt,Signe Flottorp,Jane M. Young,Jan Odgaard-Jensen,Simon D. French,Mary Ann O’Brien,Marit Johansen,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Andrew D Oxman +9 more
TL;DR: The results indicated that feedback may be more effective when baseline performance is low, the source is a supervisor or colleague, it is provided more than once, and the role of context and the targeted clinical behaviour was assessed.
5.6K