Proceedings Article10.1145/3308560.3320104
Designing Equitable Algorithms for the Web
Ricardo Baeza-Yates,Sharad Goel +1 more
- 13 May 2019
- pp 1296-1296
TL;DR: An introduction to fair machine learning is provided, beginning with a general overview of algorithmic fairness, and then discussing the equity of machine learning algorithms in the specific context of the Web, focusing on search engines and e-commerce websites.
read more
Abstract: Machine learning algorithms increasingly affect both our online and offline experiences. Researchers and policymakers, however, have rightfully raised concerns that these systems might inadvertently exacerbate societal biases. We provide an introduction to fair machine learning, beginning with a general overview of algorithmic fairness, and then discussing these issues specifically in the context of the Web. To measure and mitigate potential bias from machine learning systems, there has recently been an explosion of competing mathematical definitions of what it means for an algorithm to be fair. Unfortunately, as we show, many of the most prominent definitions of fairness suffer from subtle shortcomings that can lead to serious adverse consequences when used as an objective. To illustrate these complications, we draw on a variety of classical and modern ideas from statistics, economics, and legal theory. We further discuss the equity of machine learning algorithms in the specific context of the Web, focusing on search engines and e-commerce websites. We expose the different sources for bias on the Web and how they impact fairness. They include not only data bias, but also biases that are produced by data sampling, the algorithms per-se, user interaction and feedback loops that result from user personalization and content creation. All these lead to a vicious cycle that affects everybody. The content of this tutorial is mainly based in the work of the authors [1,2,3,4].
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
•Posted Content
The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness: A Critical Review of Fair Machine Learning.
Sam Corbett-Davies,Sharad Goel +1 more
TL;DR: It is argued that it is often preferable to treat similarly risky people similarly, based on the most statistically accurate estimates of risk that one can produce, rather than requiring that algorithms satisfy popular mathematical formalizations of fairness.
889
Bias on the web
TL;DR: Bias in Web data and use taints the algorithms behind Web-based applications, delivering equally biased results.
387
Bias on the web
Abbe Mowshowitz,Akira Kawaguchi +1 more
TL;DR: When it comes to measuring bias on the Web, there is clearly strength in numbers (of search engines, that is).
254