1. Why is decolonising Development Studies important?
Decolonising Development Studies is crucial in current times due to the presence of conservative tendencies towards 'imperial amnesia', which involves disavowing or erasing European colonialism. This is evident in historical Modernisation theory and recent works by analysts like Bruce Gilley and Nigel Biggar. Decolonising the discipline helps address the perils of replacing old power inequalities with new ones, ensuring a more inclusive and accurate understanding of global development. It also acknowledges the need to challenge Eurocentric perspectives and incorporate diverse knowledge production methods. By decolonising Development Studies, we can better address socioeconomic inequalities and resist the corporatisation of publicly funded research, leading to more meaningful and impactful outcomes in globally unsettling times.
read more
2. How to decolonise Development Studies?
To decolonise Development Studies, it is crucial to confront past inequalities and injustices. Olivia Rutazibwa suggests abandoning the discipline, but it's essential to learn from its failures. Instead, two approaches are recommended: epistemic and material. The epistemic approach focuses on challenging dominant knowledge systems, while the material approach addresses economic and social inequalities. Both approaches aim to face and come to terms with development's colonial past and neocolonial present. By acknowledging and learning from past mistakes, a new field of study can be constructed that allows for diverse perspectives and possibilities.
read more
3. What are the strategies for material decolonisation in universities?
Material decolonisation in universities involves a range of strategies aimed at promoting access to critical learning and knowledge production by all, particularly marginalized populations. These strategies include fighting for better access to higher education, advocating for free or low tuition fees, and opposing the neoliberalisation and corporatisation of universities. The goal is to create a more equitable and just education system that values knowledge for use and edification rather than commodification. Additionally, there is a growing movement against the privatisation of university-based knowledge, with initiatives such as 'Plan S' in Europe and open access repositories for publicly funded research. These efforts aim to make knowledge universally accessible and challenge the construction of problems by the market and state.
read more
4. What is the relationship between epistemic and material decolonisation?
Epistemic and material decolonisation are interconnected. Epistemic decolonisation involves transforming knowledge production and dissemination, while material decolonisation addresses socioeconomic barriers. Universities play a role in perpetuating inequalities, and decolonisation requires addressing both aspects. Indigenous scholars criticize empty gestures like land acknowledgements without actual land repatriation. The struggle for epistemic decolonisation without material decolonisation compromises both. The current campus 'culture wars' demonstrate the defense of privileges and resistance to socioeconomic inequality. Decolonising Development Studies is an ongoing struggle.
read more