Journal Article10.1111/1464-0597.00005
Culture and Individual Judgment and Decision Making
185
TL;DR: In this paper, a beaucoup publie´ sur la culture and la psychologie interculturelle d'une part, sur le jugement and la prise de de´cision d'autre part (judgment and decision making: J/DM).
read more
Abstract: Au cours des deux dernie`res de´cennies, on a beaucoup publie´ sur la culture et la psychologie interculturelle d’une part, sur le jugement et la prise de de´cision d’autre part (judgment and decision making: J/DM). Ces deux domaines ont e´te´ rapproche´s par peu de chercheurs dont on passe ici en revue les travaux. On s’inte´resse plus particulie`rement a` quatre the`mes J/DM qui ont e´te´ aborde´s d’un point de vue interculturel: l’e´valuation de la probabilite´, la perception du risque, l’attrait du risque et les formes de prise de de´cision. Notre investigation souligne une orientation positive dans les recherches J/DM interculturelles a` savoir le passage d’une simple description des diffe´rences nationales a` travers les comportements apparents a` l’examen des processus sous-jacents qui rendent compte de ces diffe´rences grâce au recours aux valeurs et aux perceptions marque´es par la culture. Pour encourager cette tendance, nous insistons pour que les futures e´tudes J/DM interculturelles soient davantage mode´lise´es (c’est-a`-dire qu’elles recherchent l’impact de V.I. changeant avec les cultures et ne se contentent pas de de´crire des diffe´rences entre groupes) et adoptent une approche en mosique dans le recueil des donne´es (c’est-a`-dire une approche qui fait appel a` des me´thodes diversifie´es et met en e´vidence des preuves convergentes pour retenir ou rejeter un mode`le).
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Effects of Differences in National Culture on Auditors' Judgments and Decisions: A Literature Review of Cross-Cultural Auditing Studies from a Judgment and Decision Making Perspective
TL;DR: A review of cross-cultural differences in auditors' judgment and decision making (JDM) is presented in this paper, where the authors present a framework that categorizes those auditor judgments and decisions most likely affected by cross-culture differences, including confidence, risk and probability judgments, risk decisions, conflict decisions, and ethical judgments.
81
Cultural Differences in Unrealistic Optimism and Pessimism: The Role of Egocentrism and Direct Versus Indirect Comparison Measures
TL;DR: The results showed that the direct method produced similar patterns across cultures because of cognitive biases, but the U.S. sample was more unrealistically optimistic than the Japanese sample, and the authors discuss how these results might influence the interpretation of previous findings on culture and self-enhancement.
77
Chinese and English Probabilistic Thinking and Risk Taking in Gambling
Lai-Yin Lau,Rob Ranyard +1 more
TL;DR: This paper found that the Chinese exhibited significantly less probabilistic thinking and riskier gambling decisions than the English, and a path analysis found that degree of probabilism was one (but not only) source of the observed cultural differences in risk taking.
76
Culture and Judgment and Decision Making
TL;DR: This work suggests new ways that cultural research is becoming relevant to mainstream JDM researchers, while also recognizing issues in need of further research.
The role of risk in making decisions under escalation situations
TL;DR: In this paper, the relationship between escalation of commitment and three risk-related variables (risk propensity, risk perception, and outcome expectancy) was investigated, and it was shown that risk perception partially mediated the effects of risk propensity and outcome expectation.
Related Papers (5)
Daniel Kahneman,Amos Tversky +1 more
Amos Tversky,Daniel Kahneman +1 more
- 01 Jan 1974
Daniel Kahneman,Amos Tversky +1 more