Journal Article10.2307/1964229
Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible
TL;DR: In this paper, a series of experiments exploring covenants alone (both one-shot and repeated communication opportunities), swords alone (repeated opportunities to sanction each other), and covenants combined with an internal sword are presented.
read more
Abstract: Contemporary political theory often assumes that individuals cannot make credible commitments where substantial temptations exist to break them unless such commitments are enforced by an external agent. One such situation may occur in relation to common pool resources, which are natural or man-made resources whose yield is subtractable and whose exclusion is nontrivial (but not necessarily impossible). Examples include fisheries, forests, grazing ranges, irrigation systems, and groundwater basins. Empirical evidence, however, suggests that appropriators in common pool resources develop credible commitments in many cases without relying on external authorities. We present findings from a series of experiments exploring (1) covenants alone (both one-shot and repeated communication opportunities); (2) swords alone (repeated opportunities to sanction each other); and (3) covenants combined with an internal sword (one-shot communication followed by repeated opportunities to sanction each other).
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Effect of rule choice in dynamic interactive spatial commons
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used laboratory experiments to examine the effect of an endogenous rule change from open access to private property as a potential solution to overharvesting in commons dilemmas.
Punishment does not promote cooperation under exploration dynamics when anti-social punishment is possible
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of anti-social punishment on the evolution of cooperation across higher mutation rates was investigated in both compulsory and voluntary public goods games, and it was shown that for intermediate and high mutation rates, adding punishment does not promote cooperation.
57
•Posted Content
Visibility of Contributions and Cost of Information: An Experiment on Public Goods
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the impact of visibility of contributors and cost of information on public good contributions and find that aversion from shame is a more powerful motivator for giving than anticipation of prestige.
Collective Action with Incomplete Commitment: Experimental Evidence
TL;DR: In this paper, face-to-face communication is investigated as an efficiency-enhancing mechanism in experimental common-pool resource environments in which the appropriation activities of outside appropriators create coordination and monitoring problems for the communicating group.
57
Profit-seeking punishment corrupts norm obedience
TL;DR: The authors found that if enforcers can benefit monetarily by punishing, they no longer view punishment as signaling a norm violation, and the result is a substantial degradation of punishment's ability to influence behavior.
56
References
•Book
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Elinor Ostrom
- 01 Jan 1990
TL;DR: In this paper, an institutional approach to the study of self-organization and self-governance in CPR situations is presented, along with a framework for analysis of selforganizing and selfgoverning CPRs.
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
TL;DR: The Economic Institutions of Capitalism as mentioned in this paper is a seminal work in the field of economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of Economic Issues: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 528-530.
17K
•Book
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications
Oliver E. Williamson
- 01 Jan 1983
16.8K
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Abstract: In 1985, the National Academy of Sciences sponsored a conference in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss common property resource management. This conference was a watershed in the development of the theoretical underpinning of institutional design for successful common pool resource (CPR) management. Since then, an international network of over 2,000 researchers has developed, and the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP), formed in 1989, has held two successful international conferences. Dominating the intellectual evolution of the field has been the work of Elinor Ostrom, co-director of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University. Her book, Governing the Commons, presents a lucid exposition of the current state of institutional analysis of common property problems. Part of the Cam-bridge series on Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, the book addresses how common pool resources may be managed successfully without falling prey to the "tragedy of the commons." Common pool resources are characterized by subtractability (i.e., withdrawal by one user reduces the amount of the resource left for other users) and joint use by a group of appropriators. Thus, a common village grazing field has forage for a limited number of beasts, and all the villagers are entitled to pasture their animals on the field. Community rules of access and management are required to sustain the field from season to season. Problems in managing CPRs arise when the rational individual determines that he will still have access to the resource even if he does not fully contribute to its maintenance (the "free rider" problem). An extensive literature discusses the effect of free riders, concluding that common pool resources will inevitably fall into ruin. One of two solutions is usually offered to avoid this problem: centralized governmental regulation or privatization. Noting the numerous occasions in which common pool resources are managed successfully with neither centralized governmental control nor privatization, Ostrom argues for a third approach to resolving the problem of the commons: the design of durable cooperative institutions that are organized and governed by the resource users. In Governing the Commons she examines small-scale common-pool resources. Resource user groups examined range in size from 50-15,000 people who rely substantially on the common pool resource for their economic well-being. She has further