Correction: a systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data.
TL;DR: The following information is missing from the Competing Interests section: KEE is the founder of Privacy Analytics Inc.
read more
Abstract: The following information is missing from the Competing Interests section: KEE is the founder of Privacy Analytics Inc.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
An Overview of Privacy Dimensions on Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examine the privacy requirements of an industrial IoT ecosystem in industry standards and present an overview of the state-of-the-art methodologies and solutions for industrial privacy threats.
Have the cake and eat it too: Differential Privacy enables privacy and precise analytics
TL;DR: It is shown that, once the privacy budget employed for differential privacy is declared and certain conditions for noise addition are satisfied, the slope parameters in the original dataset can be accurately retrieved using the estimates in the modified dataset of the variance of the independent variable and the slope parameter.
3
Peer Review
Balancing Privacy and Progress in Artificial Intelligence: Anonymization in Histopathology for Biomedical Research and Education
Neel Kanwal,Emiel A. M. Janssen,Kjersti Engan +2 more
- 18 Jul 2023
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors explore the legal regulations and terminologies for medical data sharing and highlight challenges from the histopathological perspective, and present a data-sharing guideline for histological data to foster multidisciplinary research and education.
2
Anonymization and Pseudonymization of FHIR Resources for Secondary Use of Healthcare Data
Emanuele Raso,Pierpaolo Loreti,Michele Ravaziol,Lorenzo Bracciale +3 more
2
Massive Omission of Consent (MOOC): Ethical Research in Educational Big Data Studies
TL;DR: In this paper, an investigation was made of peer-reviewed papers on MOOC teaching and learning to determine if they explicitly refer to (a) ethical considerations in their studies, and (b) obtaining formal ethical approval for their research.
2
References
A Coefficient of agreement for nominal Scales
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a procedure for having two or more judges independently categorize a sample of units and determine the degree, significance, and significance of the units. But they do not discuss the extent to which these judgments are reproducible, i.e., reliable.
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman test,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +10 more
TL;DR: An Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement is presented and updated guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are presented.
k -anonymity: a model for protecting privacy
TL;DR: The solution provided in this paper includes a formal protection model named k-anonymity and a set of accompanying policies for deployment and examines re-identification attacks that can be realized on releases that adhere to k- anonymity unless accompanying policies are respected.
9.2K
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
TL;DR: Quantitative procedures for computing the tolerance for filed and future null results are reported and illustrated, and the implications are discussed.
The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements
Julius Sim,Chris Wright +1 more
TL;DR: The issue of statistical testing of kappa is considered, including the use of confidence intervals, and appropriate sample sizes for reliability studies using kappa are tabulated.
4.1K