1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Title: constructive content-based feedback in eap contexts: lessons from a cross-border engineering-related pre-sessional course" ?
In this paper, the authors present the Constructive Feedback Course ( CFC ) on which the UK-Gaza partnership was built, analysing the design and delivery principles, and, more importantly, the students ' output, in order to evaluate their strategies when grappling with the peer-reviewer role.
read more
2. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Title: constructive content-based feedback in eap contexts: lessons from a cross-border engineering-related pre-sessional course" ?
Any meaningful change will only be realised once Global South ( in their case, Palestinian ) students can also gain credits or ( why not ? ) even travel to study within the partner institution.. Secondly, the CFC needs a closer integration into the wider project, to foster more active participation ; one possibility is to make the students co-researchers rather than mentors.. But there is certainly potential in balancing gains by the reviewers and reviewees in student partnerships across borders and cultures as this would help to readdress the issue of development of disciplinary academic literacies as well as diminish the divisive line between the First World and Global South and thus account for ‘ context of situation ’ more fully.
read more





