1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Conducting global team-based ethnography: methodological challenges and reflections" ?
This shift presents some fundamental methodological challenges, as well as practical issues of method, that have not been examined in the literature on organizational research methods.. That is the focus of this paper.. Then the authors present a detailed explanation of a global, team-based ethnographic research project that they conducted over three years.. The paper concludes by suggesting that global, team-based, ethnography provides important insights into global phenomena, such as regulation, finance, and climate change among others, that are of interest to management scholars.
read more
2. What are the future works in "Conducting global team-based ethnography: methodological challenges and reflections" ?
These insights provide helpful grounds for future research, as there is a recognized need to access global phenomena using ethnographic methods, but little reflection on or examples of such projects in the organizational literature ( e. g., Falzon 2009 ; Rouleau et al. 2012 ; van Maanen 2006 ; Watson 2011 ).. Further development of global, team-based ethnographic method is necessary for management scholarship to benefit from the rich detail and relevant practical insights that ethnography can provide into how complex things actually work in practice ( Smith 2001 ; Watson 2011, 2012 ).. As the authors followed a global practice, they emphasize the potential of global team ethnography for practice-based studies.. More broadly, global team based ethnography holds potential for investigating many issues that sit within a presumed tension between local and global, such as distinctions between local/global identity ( Ailon-Souday and Kunda, 2003 ; Sveningsson and Alvesson, 2003 ), extending studies of HRM and other management practices beyond the organization to understand them as part of broader systems ( Delbridge and Edwards 2008 ) and probing financial and regulatory interdependence ( Kalemli-‐Ozcan, Papaioannou and Peydró 2013 ; Lütz 1998 ) in an increasingly globalized world.
read more
3. What is the meaning of researcher as instrument in ethnography?
The notion of researcher as instrument in ethnography implies “subjecting the self – body, belief, personality, emotions, and cognitions – to a set of contingencies that play on others” (Van Maanen, 2011: 219).
read more
4. What is the definition of global ethnography?
Global ethnography emphasizes the circulation of objects, meanings, identities and theassociations and connections between local practices.
read more



