1. How can computational histopathology aid in identifying patients for immunotherapy?
Computational histopathology can identify patients associated with poor survival or treatment sensitivity by quantifying tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes to predict immunotherapy response. This inexpensive tool can help determine the efficacy of immunotherapy as adjuvant or first-line combination therapy, improving patient outcomes. By analyzing histopathological data, computational models can identify patterns related to genomic alterations, gene expression, and viral tumorigenesis, providing valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) serves as a multi-omics archive for biomedical research, offering over 10,000 diagnostic slides and associated genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic, and clinical data from 32 cancer types. Previous studies have shown that computational histopathology can improve prognostication compared to standard staging, making it a promising tool in cancer diagnostics and prognostics.
read more
2. What imaging resolution was used for digitizing TCGA and Helsinki ccRCC patient cohorts?
The TCGA and Helsinki ccRCC patient cohorts were digitized mainly with an imaging resolution of ~0.25 mm/px, except for 18 samples scanned at ~0.50 mm/px. This information is crucial for researchers as it ensures consistency in the digitization process, allowing for accurate comparison and analysis of histology images across different datasets. The use of standardized imaging resolutions also facilitates the integration of data from various sources, enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of research findings.
read more
3. What texture classes were annotated?
The texture classes annotated were cancer, normal renal, stromal, red blood cells, empty background, and other textures. The classes included renal cancer (n=13,057), normal renal (n=8652), stromal (n=5460), red blood cells (n=996), empty background (n=16,026), and other textures (n=8522).
read more
4. How was texture classification achieved?
Texture classification was achieved by training a multi-class CNN using a deep residual network (ResNet) with ImageNet-pretrained ResNet-18 infrastructure. The model was adapted through transfer learning, combining the pre-trained infrastructure with a fully connected layer, ReLU activation, and a softmax layer for prediction. Training occurred at all CNN layers with the Adam optimizer, fixed learning rate, batch size, and cross-entropy loss function. The model was trained on randomly cropped 256 x 256 px tiles from annotation images, augmented with horizontal-vertical rotation. Texture masks were smoothed by sliding a 3 x 3 window with a stride of 2 over the texture map and unifying the texture class in each window. In cases of ties, cancer and stroma textures were prioritized, except if the other was cancer. The pooled texture type was randomly selected from equally occurring textures.
read more