Book Chapter10.1017/CBO9781107338579.006
Computable model theory
Ekaterina B. Fokina,Valentina S. Harizanov,Alexander G. Melnikov +2 more
- 01 May 2014
- pp 124-194
52
TL;DR: In the last few decades there has been increasing interest in computable model theory and the work of Turing, Gödel, Kleene, Church, Post, and others in the mid-1930s established the rigorous mathematical foundations for the computability theory.
read more
Abstract: In the last few decades there has been increasing interest in computable model theory. Computable model theory uses the tools of computability theory to explores algorithmic content (e¤ectiveness) of notions, theorems, and constructions in various areas of ordinary mathematics. In algebra this investigation dates back to van der Waerden who in his 1930 book Modern Algebra de
ned an explicitly given
eld as one the elements of which are uniquely represented by distinguishable symbols with which we can perform the
eld operations algorithmically. In his pioneering paper on non-factorability of polynomials from 1930, van der Waerden essentially proved that an explicit
eld (F;+; ) does not necessarily have an algorithm for splitting polynomials in F [x] into their irreducible factors. Gödels incompleteness theorem from 1931 is an astonishing early result of computable model theory. Gödel showed that there are in fact relatively simple problems in the theory of ordinary whole numbers which cannot be decided from the axioms.The work of Turing, Gödel, Kleene, Church, Post, and others in the mid-1930s established the rigorous mathematical foundations for the computability theory. In the 1950s, Fröhlich and Shepherdson used the precise notion of a computable function to obtain a collection of results and examples about explicit rings and
elds. For example, Fröhlich and
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Analytic computable structure theory and $L^p$ spaces
TL;DR: It is shown that if p \geq 1 is a computable real, and if $\Omega$ is a nonzero, non-atomic, and separable measure space, then every computable presentation of L^p(\Omega) is computably linearly isometric to the standard computable Presentation of L[0,1].
25
•Posted Content
Analytic computable structure theory and $L^p$ spaces
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that every computable presentation of a measure space is computably linearly isometric to the standard computable representation of the measure space, and that every measure space has a computably categorical presentation.
14
Degrees of bi-embeddable categoricity of equivalence structures
TL;DR: It is proved that computable equivalence structures have degree of bi-embeddable categoricity, and it is shown that the notions of $$Delta ^0_\alpha $$Δα0 bi- embeddableategoricity and relative $$ Delta ^0-\alpha$$ coincide for equivalence structure for $$alpha =1,2,3$$α=1, 2,3.
Some Questions in Computable Mathematics
Denis R. Hirschfeldt
- 01 Jan 2017
TL;DR: In honor of Rod Downey’s 60th birthday, this paper discusses a few open problems connected in one way or another with him.
12
References
•Book
Algorithmic Randomness and Complexity
Rodney G. Downey,Denis R. Hirschfeldt +1 more
- 29 Oct 2010
TL;DR: This chapter discusses Randomness-Theoretic Weakness, Omega as an Operator, Complexity of C.E. Sets, and other Notions of Effective Randomness.
1.1K
•Book
Computability and randomness
André Nies
- 01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: This book provides a very readable introduction to the exciting interface of computability and randomness for graduates and researchers in computability theory, theoretical computer science, and measure theory.
776
•Book
Computable structures and the hyperarithmetical hierarchy
Christopher J. Ash
- 01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: Theorems of Barker and Davey and the Barwise-Kreisel Compactness Theorem lead to the existence of computable structures.
499
•Book
Invariant Descriptive Set Theory
Su Gao
- 03 Sep 2008
TL;DR: The Gandy-Harrington topology as mentioned in this paper is a topological extension of the Gandy basis theorem for counting models in the context of metric groups. But it is not a model-based model.
481