Journal Article10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90538-3
Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews
David Moher,Paul R. Fortin,Alejandro R. Jadad,Peter Jüni,Terry P. Klassen,J. Le Lorier,Alessandro Liberati,A. Penna,Klaus Linde +8 more
578
TL;DR: These results provide evidence for inclusion of all trial reports, irrespective of the language in which they are published, in systematic reviews, likely to increase precision and may reduce systematic errors.
read more
About: This article is published in The Lancet. The article was published on 10 Feb 1996. The article focuses on the topics: Systematic review & Publication bias.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
•Journal Article
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Abstract: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
•Book
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Julian P T Higgins,Sally Green +1 more
- 23 Sep 2019
TL;DR: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
David Moher,Sally Hopewell,Kenneth F. Schulz,Victor M. Montori,Peter C Gøtzsche,Philip J. Devereaux,Diana Elbourne,Matthias Egger,Douglas G. Altman test +8 more
TL;DR: This update of the CONSORT statement improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition, such as selective outcome reporting bias.
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
TL;DR: This report hopes this report will generate further thought about ways to improve the quality of reports of meta-analyses of RCTs and that interested readers, reviewers, researchers, and editors will use the QUOROM statement and generate ideas for its improvement.
5.1K
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
Douglas G. Altman test,Kenneth F. Schulz,David Moher,Matthias Egger,Frank Davidoff,Diana Elbourne,Peter C Gøtzsche,Tom Lang +7 more
TL;DR: The Consort Statement as mentioned in this paper is a group of scientists and editors developed to improve the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) by providing guidance to authors about how to improve their reporting of their trials.
References
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present guidelines for choosing among six different forms of the intraclass correlation for reliability studies in which n target are rated by k judges, and the confidence intervals for each of the forms are reviewed.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary?
Alejandro R. Jadad,R. A. Moore,Dawn Carroll,C. Jenkinson,David Reynolds,David J. Gavaghan,Henry J McQuay +6 more
TL;DR: An instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research is described and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality is described.
17.5K
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
TL;DR: Empirical evidence is provided that inadequate methodological approaches in controlled trials, particularly those representing poor allocation concealment, are associated with bias.
6.1K
Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program.
TL;DR: In this article, the sample size and power equations for these designs are shown to be special cases of two generic formulae for sample sizes and power calculations, and a computer program is available that can be used for studies with dichotomous, continuous, or survival response measures.
1.9K
Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews
TL;DR: Although the indexing terms available for searching Medline for randomised clinical trials have improved, sensitivity still remains unsatisfactory.