Journal Article10.2307/2234208
Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events*
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the dynamics of allocation under increasing returns in a context where increasing returns arise naturally: agents choosing between technologies competing for adoption, and examine how these influence selection of the outcome.
read more
Abstract: This paper explores the dynamics of allocation under increasing returns in a context where increasing returns arise naturally: agents choosing between technologies competing for adoption. Modern, complex technologies often display increasing returns to adoption in that the more they are adopted, the more experience is gained with them, and the more they are improved.1 When two or more increasing-return technologies 'compete' then, for a 'market' of potential adopters, insignificant events may by chance give one of them an initial advantage in adoptions. This technology may then improve more than the others, so it may appeal to a wider proportion of potential adopters. It may therefore become further adopted and further improved. Thus a technology that by chance gains an early lead in adoption may eventually 'corner the market' of potential adopters, with the other technologies becoming locked out. Of course, under different 'insignificant events' - unexpected successes in the performance of prototypes, whims of early developers, political circumstances - a different technology might achieve sufficient adoption and improvement to come to dominate. Competitions between technologies may have, multiple potential outcomes. It is well known that allocation problems with increasing returns tend to exhibit multiple equilibria, and so it is not surprising that multiple outcomes should appear here. Static analysis can typically locate these multiple equilibria, but usually it cannot tell us which one will be 'selected'. A dynamic approach might be able to say more. By allowing the possibility of 'random events' occurring during adoption, it might examine how these influence ' selection' of the outcome - how some sets of random 'historical events' might cumulate to drive the process towards one market-share outcome, others to drive it towards another. It might also reveal how the two familiar increasingreturns properties of non-predictability and potential inefficiency come about: how increasing returns act to magnify chance events as adoptions take place, so that
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The thin red line between success and failure: Path dependence in the diffusion of innovative production technologies
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that diffusion processes are similar across successful and failed innovations, and they test these predictions quantitatively by analyzing the diffusion of the DC-10 and L-1011 airplanes and find support for their theory linking the social information provided by firm adoptions to the success of innovative production technologies.
101
•Journal Article
The triple helix model and the study of knowledge-based innovation systems
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the changing nature of knowledge-based innovation systems in light of the dynamic interconnections between the university, industry and government, and examine how the overlay of communications in university-industry-govemment relations reshapes the systems of innovations that are currently subjects of debate, policy-making, and scientific study.
101
Knowledge Creation and Organizational Capabilities of Innovating and Imitating Firms
Arie Y. Lewin,Silvia Massini +1 more
- 01 Jan 2004
TL;DR: Knowledge, innovation and technological progress have been central themes of research in macro and microeconomics, innovation processes and strategy as discussed by the authors, and Schumpeter's seminal book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy is often credited with originating and stimulating interest, theoretical development and research on processes of creative destruction, involving new products, processes, markets, resources and organizations, and the role of the entrepreneur.
100
Towards resource-efficient and service-oriented integrated infrastructure operation
Katy Roelich,Christof Knoeri,Julia K. Steinberger,Julia K. Steinberger,Liz Varga,Philip T. Blythe,David Butler,Rajat Gupta,Gareth Harrison,Chris J. Martin,Phil Purnell +10 more
TL;DR: New insights and ideas are presented by considering the challenge of the transition towards a MUSCo infrastructure to provide essential service delivery at radically decreased levels of resource use.
100
Economic growth and technological change: A comparison of insights from a neo-classical and an evolutionary perspective
TL;DR: The authors discussed the insights from both the neo-classical and the evolutionary perspectives on economic growth and technological change, and argued that in evolutionary models technological and behavioral diversity, uncertainty, path dependency, and irreversibility are elaborated in a more sophisticated and explicit way than in the traditional Solow-Swan model.
100
References
•Posted Content
Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation
Giovanni Dosi,Fabio Arcangeli,Paul A. David,Frank Engelman,Christopher Freeman,Massimo Moggi,Richard R. Nelson,Luigi Orsenigo,Nathan Rosenberg +8 more
TL;DR: In this paper, Arcangeli, Paul David, Frank Engelman, Christopher Freeman, Massimo Moggi, Richard Nelson, Luigi Orsenigo, Nathan Rosenberg, Michele Salvati, G. N. von Tunzelman, two anonymous referees, and the participants at the meeting of the Committee on Distribution, Growth, and Technical Progress of the Italian National Research Council (CNR), Rome, November 16, 1985, have helped with various redraftings.
4.9K
Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities
Michael L. Katz,Carl Shapiro +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyze the adoption pattern of technologies in industries where network externalities are significant and find that the pattern of adoption depends on whether technologies are sponsored by an entity that has property rights to the technology and is willing to make investments to promote it.
3K
Standardization, compatibility, and innovation
Joseph Farrell,Garth Saloner +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine whether standardization benefits can trap an industry in an obsolete or inferior standard when there is a better alternative available, and discuss the extent to which the problem can be overcome by communication.