Open AccessJournal Article
Comparison of universities’ scientific performance using bibliometric indicators
TL;DR: In this article, the scientific performance of National Taiwan University (NTU) and Peking University (PKU) were compared by two indicators, namely citations per publication and h-index, based on the data extracted from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded), social science Citation Index(SSCI), and Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) Web of Science from 2000 to 2009.
read more
Abstract: The scientific performance of National Taiwan University (NTU) and Peking University (PKU) were compared by two indicators, namely citations per publication and h-index, based on the data extracted from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded), Social Science Citation Index(SSCI), and Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) Web of Science from 2000 to 2009. Analyzed aspects covered publication outputs, publication patterns, and international and inter-institutional collaborations of the two universities. The two universities were in the same scale based on the number of publications. Articles from electrical and electronic engineering dominated the other articles in NTU while PKU researchers published a great number of articles in the basic science fields. Material science was the new field for these two universities. The USA had the greatest number of collaborated articles accounting for 15% and 12% of total articles with NTU and PKU respectively. Article impact followed a decreasing order of international collaboration, inter-institutional collaboration, and independent articles for both universities. PKU articles had higher visibility. In addition, the Essential Science Indicators were applied to investigate the research activities of NTU and PKU
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Research performance and trends of fluorescent carbon nanoparticles: a science citation index expanded-based analysis
Sheng-Tao Yang,Yuh-Shan Ho +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a bibliometric approach to assess publication performances and trends in fluorescent carbon nanoparticle research using literatures in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) has been carried out.
8
Research impact and productivity of Benin according to the Science Citation Index Expanded (1973 to 2018)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed the scientific output of Benin, according to the Science Citation Index Expanded, in a 46-year period, and found 4 557 documents, published between 1973 and 2018.
Measuring Scholarly Productivity of Long Island Educational Institutions: Using Web of Science and Scopus as a Tool
Clara Y. Tran,Selenay Aytac +1 more
TL;DR: This paper explores how to utilize two well-known library databases, Thomson Reuter’s Web of Science and Elsevier's Scopus, to quantify Long Island educational institutions’ scholarly productivity.
Comments on “Research on sulfur oxides and nitric oxides released from coal-fired flue gas and vehicle exhaust: a bibliometric analysis” by Wang et al. (2019)
TL;DR: A bibliometric analysis of sulfur oxides and nitric oxides released from coal-fired flue gas and vehicle exhaust using the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIEXPANDED), Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics finds keywords “sulfuretin” and “flue gases” are missing in the original paper and might not be appropriate.
5
References
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
TL;DR: The index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number ≥h, is proposed as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher.
Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.
TL;DR: In 1971, the Institute for Scientfic Information decided to undertake a systematic analysis of journal citation patterns across the whole of science and technology.
Does the H index have predictive power
TL;DR: The findings indicate that the h index is better than other indicators considered (total citation count, citations per paper, and total paper count) in predicting future scientific achievement.
1K
The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the results of a study on the potentialities of "bibliometric" data as tools for university research policy, and the main conclusion is that the use of bibliometric data for evaluation purposes carries a number of problems, both with respect to data collection and handling, and in respect to the interpretation of Bibliometric results.
532
The h index and career assessment by numbers
TL;DR: A new citation-based index (Hirsh's h index) is described and several factors that might influence it for ecologists and evolutionary biologists, such as gender, country of residence, subdiscipline and total publication output are examined.